2015
DOI: 10.15664/jtr.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Counterterrorism Policies on the PKK-inflicted Violence during the Democratization Process of Turkey

Abstract: This study tries to explore the relationship between soft-line governmental policy interventions of Turkey and the responses of the PKK (The Kurdistan Workers' Party) by using time series data from 1995 to 2010. The negative binomial specifications for two models, the number of incidents and the number casualties are used. The aggregated impact of soft-line policies on the level of violence is found to be positive and significant. In one hand, Turkey's EU accession process had a decreasing impact on PKK inflic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, discrimination against Kurds has fueled armed conflict between the Kurdish insurgent group PKK and the Turkish government. PKK’s demands for recognition and representation demonstrate that the Turkish discrimination is perceived as illegitimate among the Kurds (Ciftci and Kula, 2015). Other examples of problematic discrimination involve Sunni dominance in Iraq, Islamic dominance in Sudan, and Alawite dominance in Syria.…”
Section: Monarchical Legitimacy and Armed Conflict In The Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, discrimination against Kurds has fueled armed conflict between the Kurdish insurgent group PKK and the Turkish government. PKK’s demands for recognition and representation demonstrate that the Turkish discrimination is perceived as illegitimate among the Kurds (Ciftci and Kula, 2015). Other examples of problematic discrimination involve Sunni dominance in Iraq, Islamic dominance in Sudan, and Alawite dominance in Syria.…”
Section: Monarchical Legitimacy and Armed Conflict In The Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%