Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change 2 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1305-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of “Dynamic Daphnia Test” After a Decade of Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a dominant member of the planktonic community, Daphnia play a central role in aquatic food webs, serving as the primary grazers of algae, bacteria and protozoans, and as the primary forage for fish. As a result, Daphnia are long recognized as a sentinel/indicator species in freshwater ecosystems and they are routinely used to determine the toxicity of aqueous solutions and to gauge the quality of inland waters [ 7 ]. Therefore, the gross-level responses of Daphnia to a number of environmental pollutants are well characterized [ 8 ], and these responses are referenced by environmental protection agencies (e.g., United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environment Canada, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) to define regulatory limits [ 9 ], monitor the quality of industrial and municipal effluents [ 10 , 11 ] and estimate the risk of environmental toxins on natural environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a dominant member of the planktonic community, Daphnia play a central role in aquatic food webs, serving as the primary grazers of algae, bacteria and protozoans, and as the primary forage for fish. As a result, Daphnia are long recognized as a sentinel/indicator species in freshwater ecosystems and they are routinely used to determine the toxicity of aqueous solutions and to gauge the quality of inland waters [ 7 ]. Therefore, the gross-level responses of Daphnia to a number of environmental pollutants are well characterized [ 8 ], and these responses are referenced by environmental protection agencies (e.g., United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environment Canada, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) to define regulatory limits [ 9 ], monitor the quality of industrial and municipal effluents [ 10 , 11 ] and estimate the risk of environmental toxins on natural environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1986, a Sandoz chemical storage building in Basel (Switzerland) caught fire, spewing approximately 40 tons of insecticides and 400 kg of atrazine into the Rhine River, resulting in the devastation of a large portion of the river's biocoenosis as well as drinking-water production (40 waterworks had to close for one month) from an already polluted river [6]. Shortly after the accident, an automated biomonitoring system, such as the dynamic Daphnia test (a device that electronically measures Daphnia swimming behavior) [7], located 500 km down-stream detected and reported the event. Samples taken at the time of the alarm showed that the same types of pesticides triggering these alarms were stored in the Sandoz facility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%