The Eurozone crisis’ impact: a de-Europeanization of Greek and Portuguese foreign policies?

Abstract

This article compares the impact of the Eurozone crisis on the foreign policies of Greece and Portugal from a de-Europeanization perspective. These two Southern European countries were significantly Europeanized in the past and both suffered greatly from the Euro crisis. Focusing on the Troika period and on relations with China, the article shows that both Greece and Portugal's foreign policies towards Beijing went through an important degree of de-Europeanization during the Eurozone crisis. Such effect was, however, more intense and durable in the case of Greece, much driven by domestic politics. These national factors were intimately connected with exogenous drivers, such as EU-level developments and Beijing's agency, both more relevant for illuminating the case of Portugal. Ultimately, the Eurozone crisis strengthened the influence of external actors like China over EU foreign policy-making, working as a complementary driver of de-Europeanization.

Understanding the Cultural Trauma behind Identity Creating a Third Space in the Middle of Polarity

“…These phenomena show that cultural trauma narratives are closely related to collective memory, nostalgia and historical romance (Norris and Inglehart, 2019;Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser, 2018;Betz and Johnson, 2004). Related to this, studies on the impact of a traumatic past on voting were also discussed by Wittenberg (2006), Tilley and Evans (2011), Acemoglu et al (2011), Pop-Eleches and Tucker (2017), Hoerner, Jaax, and Rodon (2019, Haffert (2021);and Raimundo et al (2021).…”

Disentangling populism and nationalism as discourses of foreign policy: the case of Greek foreign policy during the Eurozone crisis 2010-19

“…Even the nearrupture with the EU at the height of the populist contestation of austerity in the first half of 2015 was scaled back, as SYRIZA reverted to more mainstream actions and rhetoric (albeit very slowly in some areas, demonstrating that discourses can also leave sticky traces in the real world). 88 Despite this mixed picture in terms of applied policies, the discursive view has helped distinguish between populism and nationalism, as well as demonstrate their importance, in how foreign policy is used to draw political boundaries in domestic society and embody an antagonistic or deferential relationship between political community and authority. Thus, foreign policy is highly important as a field where the ideas and values under which a state incorporates its domestic society are contested, reinforced or modi fied, especially in periods of political instability and nearrupture of statesociety rela tions like the 2010s in Greece.…”

“…Even though previous proEuropean governments had made openings to nonWestern powers like signing energy deals with Russia in the late 2000s and welcoming Chinese investments in the early 2010s, for the SYRIZAANEL government this was used as a reminder of its mission to restore sovereignty to the Greek people from the international (Western, and especially EU) structures that subjugated them. 79 Emancipatory populism, liberal nationalism or liberal cosmopolitanism? The many faces of Greek foreign policy under the second SYRIZA-ANEL government After accepting a new bailout in July 2015, foreign policy became for Tsipras a field for his rehabilitation on the international stage and bolstering his damaged profile at home.…”

Portugal’s strategic response to Brexit: enduring Europeanisation?

“…The importance given to other international fora and the instrumental projection of national preferences onto the EU level would have prevented a deeper Europeanisation of Portuguese foreign policy (Raimundo 2013;Robinson 2016). This idea of a shallower EU effect receives further credence by considering the extent of the recent de-Europeanisation in Portugal's foreign policy during the Eurozone crisis (Raimundo, Stavridis, and Tsardanidis 2021).…”