The European Union Risk Assessment on Zinc and Zinc Compounds: The Process and the Facts

Abstract

A risk assessment on zinc and zinc compouns was carried out withn the framework of Council Regulation 793/93/EEC on Existing Chemicals. This risk assessment basically followed the European Union (EU) technical guidance documents (TGDs). These TGDs are built on the current knowledge on quantitative risk assessments, mainly for organic chemicals. This article describes the tailor-made approach for the zinc risk assessment. This work lasted almost a decade and involved the contributions of all EU member states and industry, who discussed the risk assessment during technical meetings. The risk assessment is initially based on scientific findings but is interrelated with pragmatic considerations. It follows a comprehensive approach, covering both environmental and human health. In the environmental part, new methodologies were developed to deal with the natural background of zinc, essentiality, speciation, and the use of species sensitivity distributions. The major results and the process of drawing conclusions of the risk assessment are outlined: potential environmental risks of zinc and zinc compounds may occur at local and regional scales in surfacewater, sediment, and soil. No potential health risks were identified for consumers and man indirectly exposed via the environment. For workers, potential health risks were identified only for zinc oxide and zinc chloride.

Multigenerational exposure to silver ions and silver nanoparticles reveals heightened sensitivity and epigenetic memory inCaenorhabditis elegans

“…Such assessment factors can range from the division of toxicity test statistics (e.g. EC x (concentration needed for x% effect), no observed effect concentration) by a factor of 1000 down to division by a factor of 3 [29,30]. The observed greater-than-10-fold increase in sensitivity from P generation nematodes to the multigenerationally Ag-PVP-and AgNO 3 -exposed cohorts challenges this assessment factor-based approach.…”

Heavy metal distribution between contaminated soil and Paulownia tomentosa, in a pilot-scale assisted phytoremediation study: Influence of different complexing agents

“…In fact, heavy metals have a significant toxicity for humans, animals, microorganisms and plants (Wagner 1994;Gaetke and Chow, 2003;HernandezOchoa et al, 2005;Quartacci et al, 2005;Bodar et al, 2006;Fotakis and Timbrell, 2006). Moreover, heavy metals are not subject to degradation processes and therefore remain almost indefinitely in the environment, although the bioavailability of these chemicals can change considerably depending on their interactions with the various soil constituents.…”

The importance of physical and chemical characterization in nanoparticle toxicity studies

“…Further chemical investigations using equilibrium dialysis confi rmed rapid dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles with a saturation solubility of around 5 to 10 mg/L in our experimental system. Consideration of published species sensitivity distributions (Bodar et al 2005) indicates that 5 mg/L Zn is suffi cient to cause adverse effects to a majority of aquatic species, including invertebrates and fi sh, and not just to sensitive unicellular algae. Thus, the most likely cause of nano (or bulk) ZnO aquatic toxicity is via dissolution and not necessarily through any specifi c particulate effects.…”