The European Union and the Insiders/Outsiders of Europe: Russia and the Post-Soviet Space

Abstract

The European Union is being perceived in Eastern Europe as an important actor, but with very different connotations. Some neighbours have membership ambitions and see the EU as a model (cf. the enlargement/democracy narrative). For others, relations with the EU are an instrument to balance regional relations (cf. the geopolitical narrative). Finally, some perceive the EU as striving to expand its influence beyond its borders (cf. the value empire narrative). The chapter investigates the discourses on the EU in the eastern neighbourhood and Russia. It starts from the assumption that perceptions in the region have a strong impact on the EU's ability to pursue its policy goals. At the same time, EU policy influences debates in its partner countries. By examining this interrelationship this paper aims to understand the extent to which the EU is able to play the role of an important regional actor in the post-Soviet space.

Balancing on the Shoulders of Giants: Moldova's Foreign Policy toward Russia and the European Union

“…Faced with a wave of enlargement in 2004 and the accession of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007, Brussels became more proactive in the region toward 2002 and elaborated a ENP in 2004 that sought to stabilize the countries to its East and promote both internal reforms and closer trade and institutional connections. The 2003 EU Security Strategy pointed to the necessity for a “ring of well‐governed countries” in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean (quoted in Fischer :32), which the ENP attempted to ensure with the provision of various incentives for neighbors to gradually meet EU standards (Smith :763). The ENP was also conceptualized as an alternative to EU membership for countries at the edges of the European Union (Milcher, Slay, and Collins :3) that would secure borders in a wider European geographical area (Sasse :295).…”

Economic Regionalisation in the Russian Foreign Policy: Is it Possible to talk about the Eurasianist Model of Integration?

“…Her ne kadar Avrupa Birliği'nin bölgesel bütünleşme modeli belirli bir tarihsel çekişmelerin aşılması mantığıyla ve jeopolitik bütünlük çerçevesine otursa da, "Avrupa değerleri" dediğimiz ve Greko-Romen ve Hıristiyanlık kültürlerinin mirası üzerine Germen-İskandinav kimlik unsurlarının katılımıyla oluşmuş bir normlar yapısına dayanmaktadır. Halbuki Avrasya coğrafyası, hem etnik, hem dinsel, hem de coğrafya anlamında birçok farklılığı barındırmanın yanı sıra, farklı üretim biçimleri ve gelenekleri ve büyük nüfus hacmiyle zor bir alan olarak değerlendirilmelidir (Fischer, 2012). Birçok alt-bölgenin varlığı (Orta Asya, Hindiçin, Güneydoğu Asya gibi), Asya kıtasında kimliklerin ve buna bağlı olarak ekonomik yapıların kendi aralarında kümülasyonunu da doğurmuştur.…”

Russia and Carl Schmitt: the hybridity of resistance in the globalised world

“…For Russia, the transition to democracy and adaptation to the liberal rules of international conduct became negatively associated with losing state sovereignty (Fischer, 2012). Since the times of Kievan Rus', Ukraine and Russia have battled and identified themselves against common enemies.…”

“…According to Fischer (2012) and Sakwa (2015b), the EU expansion is an imperialist move to overtake Russia's sphere of influence through entrenching liberal values. Hence, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (cited in Fischer, 2012: 39) asked: "We are accused of trying to have spheres of influence.…”