Russia and Carl Schmitt: the hybridity of resistance in the globalised world

Abstract

The rise of state dissidence has challenged the hegemony of Western liberalism on the international relations stage. Russia's ongoing involvement in the Ukraine crisis is a case in point. Russia's dissidence threatens not only the already fragile European order, but also the potency of liberalism as a system of international norms. Hence, a great deal of attention has been given to trying to determine the possible failures and solutions of global governance in dealing with Russia. In contrast, this article argues for the need to understand state resistance from the perspective of the dissenting state. By drawing upon Carl Schmitt's influential critique of globalizing liberalism, the article attempts to analyse what Russia's resistance reveals about the subtle mechanisms of global liberal governance. On the basis of Schmitt's theory, the article establishes that Russia's dissidence can be an attempt to preserve state sovereignty and its unique "way of life", as well as state pluralism on the global arena. In fact, to eradicate conflict, liberal governance attempts to suppress state pluralism as a potential cause of conflict. In the long run, however, this risks provoking radical resistance in response. The article then analyses the "hybrid" strategy of Russia's resistance employed in the Ukraine crisis, based on which it identifies the major weaknesses of liberal governance. The article concludes that the inadequacy of international law to deal with unconventional forms of warfare and refusal to acknowledge the possibility of animosity can significantly debilitate liberal governance. This article is published as part of a collection on global governance.

3 | 1 | 2023 Framing Environments in Russia: Critical Reflections on Ecology, Culture and Power

“…The Motherland of the Giant Hogweed 73 population is left on the ruins of empire and its hopes. 3 On the other hand, the notion of an existential threat, championed by German philosopher Carl Schmitt whose ideas influenced Vladimir Putin and Russian Neo-Authoritarianism, serves to unite society in the face of adversity in the post-Soviet era, signifying a continuation of Cold War paranoia and a post-apocalyptic vision of Russia's future (Kurylo 2016). In this context, the giant hogweed has become an unmistakable cultural artefact of contemporary Russia, symbolising both the resilience and despair that characterise its environmental and cultural landscapes.…”