The European Model of Agriculture

Cardwell, Michael

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242160.001.0001

Cited by 63 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Agriculture is increasingly seen as an activity producing a complex set of interconnected outputs to be evaluated (at the same time) with economic, social and environmental perspectives. For this reason, it is also considered somehow an exception compared to other economic sectors (Cardwell, 2004). The traditional role of agriculture is to secure food and fibre production, and this role is still central in connection to food safety and food security issues.…”

Section: Water Management and Agriculture In Italymentioning

confidence: 99%

Water management and irrigated agriculture in Italy: multicriteria analysis of alternative policy scenarios

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Irrigated agriculture in Europe is facing major changes, due to the reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy and the coming into force of the new Water Framework Directive (60/2000). The objective of this paper is to evaluate the perceived outcome of different scenarios from the point of view of different stakeholders, as an instrument to support policy in the sector of irrigated farming. The methodology is based on the multicriteria analysis of water and agricultural policy scenarios and is applied in five study areas in Italy. The pay-offs for different stakeholders differ greatly between scenarios. Basic contrasts between farmer-related and environmental/water institutions are emphasised when facing different futures. This shows that greater coordination is necessary to provide consistent policies and appropriate incentives to farmers

show abstract

Section: Water Management and Agriculture In Italymentioning

confidence: 99%

Water management and irrigated agriculture in Italy: multicriteria analysis of alternative policy scenarios

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…where Π i is the outward multilateral resistance and P j the inward multilateral resistance (Anderson 2010;Anderson & van Wincoop 2003, 2004Anderson & Yotov 2009). …”

Section: Microeconomics Of Decouplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Payment decoupling and intra-European calf trade

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu However, member states were given substantial discretion over the degree and timing of the reform implementation. As a result, different implementation schemes coexist within the EU, keeping certain parts of the income support coupled to current production levels. This coexistence leads to distortions of production incentives, factor misallocations, and artificial trade flows. Here, we examine these effects in the beef sector where full decoupling was not obligatory for all member states. Based on a cost minimization framework, we derive a sector-specific trade model with heterogeneous firms and quality differences. The model is used to examine the effects of different implementation schemes on intra-European calf trade. Empirical results confirm that the expected distortions to trade flows occured, violating the fundamental CAP principle of Market Unity. Terms of use: Documents in

show abstract

“…This, however, did not, by a long way, mean full compliance. Rather, the EU confronted the global neo-liberal policy paradigm with its own European model of agriculture (Cardwell 2004). By emphasizing the need for continued protection of and support for the multifunctional, socio-ecological benefits of farming, the EU established a distinct farm-policy model of its own, thus defending the European understanding of a desirable and appropriate farm policy against market-liberal global influences (Coleman, Grant, and Josling 2004, 97-98).…”

Section: Setting the Context: The Agricultural Policy Framework At Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflecting the Global? The Common Agricultural Policy and Its Perception in Public Media Discourse

Zschache

2015

Journal of Contemporary European Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paradigm shift in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is an instructive case to study the Europeanization of national media discourses. Yet, the symbolic influence of CAP reform cannot be sufficiently understood without considering its embeddedness in global policy frameworks. Hence, by means of content analysis, this paper aims to elucidate the impact of both global and EU farm-policy ideas on domestic debates. In particular, it seeks to reveal to what extent the multiple authorship behind the reform is reflected in discussion. Thus, the focus is on the institutional entrepreneurs with a say in the media, the ideas promoted and discursive interrelations.

show abstract

The European Model of Agriculture

Cited by 63 publications

References 0 publications

Water management and irrigated agriculture in Italy: multicriteria analysis of alternative policy scenarios

Water management and irrigated agriculture in Italy: multicriteria analysis of alternative policy scenarios

Payment decoupling and intra-European calf trade

Reflecting the Global? The Common Agricultural Policy and Its Perception in Public Media Discourse

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About