2015
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbv001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Payment decoupling and intra-European calf trade

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Ihle et al (2012) showed that decoupling reduced the prices of calves while EU spatial price relationships were impacted by the heterogeneity in the implementation of the policy. A similar study by Prehn et al (2015) shows that the heterogeneity in the implementation of the decoupling led to artificial trading that infringed the concept of the single market of agricultural products. However, decoupling was not fully implemented until 2007, thus the majority of the empirical work so far is based on relatively few observations for studying its implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, Ihle et al (2012) showed that decoupling reduced the prices of calves while EU spatial price relationships were impacted by the heterogeneity in the implementation of the policy. A similar study by Prehn et al (2015) shows that the heterogeneity in the implementation of the decoupling led to artificial trading that infringed the concept of the single market of agricultural products. However, decoupling was not fully implemented until 2007, thus the majority of the empirical work so far is based on relatively few observations for studying its implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These findings have important implications in practice. For example, disparities in the impact of different payment implementations on efficiency across countries post‐MTR could have induced distortions in the intra‐EU trade of agricultural goods (Renwick et al 2011; Prehn, Brümmer, and Thompson 2015). Moreover, the design of income support post‐2013 allowed the continued maintenance of voluntary coupled support for specific farming sectors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%