2003
DOI: 10.1080/1350176032000124087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): a European policy to fight against economic and financial fraud?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 See Fisher (2004, 510) for similar observations about the use of 'accountability' in the European context. 5 See for the rise of administrative accountability in the EU: Harlow (2002, 108-143), Magnette (2003), Laffan (2003), and Pujas (2003). 6 See Bovens (2005), of which some of the following paragraphs are drawn.…”
Section: New Forms Of Accountability and European Governance: Taking mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 See Fisher (2004, 510) for similar observations about the use of 'accountability' in the European context. 5 See for the rise of administrative accountability in the EU: Harlow (2002, 108-143), Magnette (2003), Laffan (2003), and Pujas (2003). 6 See Bovens (2005), of which some of the following paragraphs are drawn.…”
Section: New Forms Of Accountability and European Governance: Taking mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, fraud and other forms of unethical behavior in organizations have received significant attention in the business ethics literature (Uddin and Gillet, 2002;Elias, 2002;Rockness and Rockness, 2005;Robison and Santore, 2011), investment circles (Pujas, 2003;Albrecht, et al, 2011), and regulator communities (Farber, 2005;Ferrell and Ferrell, 2011). Scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Xerox, Quest, Tyco, HealthSouth, and other companies created a loss of confidence in the integrity of the American business (Carson, 2003) and even caused the accounting profession in the United States to reevaluate and reestablish basic accounting procedures (Apostolon and Crumbley, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pujas [18] believes that OLAF's legitimacy is regularly questioned by national and European institutions because of its semi-autonomous state and the lack of guarantees regarding the objectivity and transparency of its investigations.…”
Section: Independence Of Olafmentioning
confidence: 99%