The EU’s Education Policy Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Discourse and Content Analysis

Abstract

Following the severe impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on education systems in Europe, the EU has been called upon to provide a concerted response to the crisis in a context where member states provided their own diverse responses. Against this background, the aim of this article is to uncover and critically examine the EU’s education policy discourse and promoted narratives since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, and by doing so evaluate the EU’s response-ability for education recovery during the crisis. A conceptual framework has been devised to analyse the responsiveness of an international entity, such as the EU, based on organisational and neo-institutionalist theories. Data were collected through a combination of discourse analysis and computer-assisted content analysis, which was applied to official EU education policy documents published in 2020. The following categories emerged from the analysis process, indicating that the EU perceives education recovery as: “upskilling and reskilling”, “digital transformation” and “sustainable development”. The findings suggest a substantial continuation between the EU’s pre- and post-Covid-19 strategy in the education sector, and even an acceleration in the same direction, revealing a lack of real change in the EU’s response, which was focused predominantly on the economic and employability approach to education.

Goodbye Human Annotators? Content Analysis of Policy Debates using ChatGPT

“…The value of policy discourse analysis is demonstrated by its broad applicability, for example, in analyses on environmental policy (Gutierrez Garzon et al 2022), welfare policies (Öktem & Erdogan 2020), urban mobility (Towns & Henstra 2018) or educational policy (Symeonidis, Francesconi & Agostini 2021). Moreover, those using the Discourse Network Analysis framework also aim to find arguments employed in policy debates (e.g.…”

Sustainable Education at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Review Study Field Review

“…The initiative has also sought to advance theory building by combining the theory of systemic evolution and sustainable higher education development for creating a linked underlying systemic framework. This framework can be used to not only substantiate ideas but also to guide research and sustainable development in the scientific context [19]. It focuses on the sustainability of education by recognizing the importance of environmental skills and knowledge for students [20].…”

Norm collisions in European Union sectoral governance during the COVID‐19 pandemic: How the European Commission reconfigures norms in crises

“…We illustrate these dynamics through an explorative, interpretative‐qualitative analysis of Commission strategies and working plans in the sectors of EU higher education and transport policy. We chose these two cases due to the disruptive impact the COVID‐19 pandemic had on these sectors, particularly with regard to the mobility of citizens, whose social and economic practices ground to halt (Shortall et al, 2022; Symeonidis et al, 2021). Equally, the two sectors are of key relevance to core norms of European integration, such as competitiveness, cohesion, and, again, social mobility (Meunier & Mickus, 2020; Vesan & Corti, 2021).…”