Goodbye Human Annotators? Content Analysis of Policy Debates using ChatGPT
Erwin Gielens,
Jakub Sowula
Abstract:Content analysis is a valuable tool for analysing policy discourse, but annotation by humans is costly and time-consuming. ChatGPT is a potentially valuable tool to automate content analysis for policy debates, largely replacing human annotators. We evaluate ChatGPT’s ability to classify documents using argument descriptions, by comparing its performance with human annotators for two policy debates: the Universal Basic Income debate on Dutch Twitter (2014-2016) and the pension reforms debate in German newspape… Show more
Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.