The EU’s competences: The 'vertical' perspective on the multilevel system

Abstract

This Living Review deals with the division of competences between the EU and its member states in a multilevel political system. The article summarises research on the relations between the EU and the national and sub-national levels of the member states. It provides an overview on normative and theoretical concepts and empirical research. From the outset, European integration was about the transfer of powers from the national to the European level, which evolved as explicit bargaining among governments or as an incremental drift. This process was reframed with the competence issue entering the agenda of constitutional policy. It now concerns the shape of the European multilevel polity as a whole, in particular the way in which powers are allocated, delimited and linked between the different levels.The article is structured as follows: First of all, normative theories of a European federation are discussed. Section 2 deals with different concepts of federalism and presents approaches of the economic theory of federalism in the context of the European polity. The normative considerations conclude with a discussion of the subsidiarity principle and the constitutional allocation of competences in the European Treaties. Section 3 covers the empirical issue of how to explain the actual allocation of competences (scope and type) between levels. Integration theories are presented here only in so far as they explain the transfer of competence from the national to the European level or the limits of this centralistic dynamics.Normative and empirical theories indeed provide some general guidelines and conclusions on the allocation of competences in the EU, but they both contradict the assumption of a separation of competences. The article therefore concludes that politics and policy-making This review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Austria License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/at/ 2 Arthur Benz and Christina Zimmer in the EU have to be regarded as multilevel governance (Section 4). The main theoretical approaches and results from empirical research on European multilevel governance are presented before the article concludes with recommendations for further discussion and research in the field (Section 5). Following Fritz Scharpf, it is recommended that research on the vertical allocation of competences and the application of shared competences in the European multilevel governance should stop searching for holistic approaches (grand theory) explaining unique features of the European political system; instead, research will best succeed when relying on a variety of simpler theories and models to describe European governance modes.Living Reviews in European Governance http://www.livingreviews.org /lreg-2008-3 How to cite this article Owing to the fact that a Living Reviews article can evolve over time, we recommend to cite the article as follows:Arthur Benz and Christina Zimmer, "The EU's competences: The 'vertical' perspective on the multilevel sy...

Harmonizing Internationally to Harmonize Internally: Accounting for a Global Exit from the EU's Decision Trap

“…Multi‐level policy‐making in the EU often tends to be studied in isolation from its international environment. This tends to be the case also for the JDT model, which provides a comprehensive theoretical explanation of policy progress and stalemate within the EU (Benz and Zimmer, , p. 19). Specifically, it posits that policy‐making under the Community method in situations of divided Member State preferences leads to suboptimal, lowest common denominator deals or even complete blockades (Scharpf, , ).…”

Multi-level Governance: Conceptual challenges and case studies from Australia

“…This has been noticeable in federal jurisdictions within the EU, such as Germany, as well as countries that have undergone devolution, such as the United Kingdom (e.g. Börzel and Hölsi 2003;Asare et al 2009;Schmidt 1999;Benz and Zimmer 2010;Entwistle et al 2012;Piattoni 2012 the sort of multi-centred collaboration that is now being contemplated, and that could involve federal, provincial, municipal, Aboriginal, and foreign governments, as well as transnational institutions, will be much more complex and increasingly political than earlier federal-provincial interactions.…”

Regional demands for policy participation in the EU multilevel system

“…For a sociological overview of this data set of administrative elites and for further information, seeBauer et al (2010).9 Multilevel governance is a complex concept comprising aspects that concern policy competences and also varying modes of coordination and interaction(Benz 2007;Benz and Zimmer 2008;Tömmel 2008). In our project, we limited our analysis exclusively to aspects concerning policy competence allocation.10 The twelve policy areas are social affairs, asylum and immigration, foreign affairs and defence, health care and consumer protection, border police and frontier defence, culture and education, agriculture, tourism, environmental protection, monetary policy, economic development and structural policy, and research and technology.…”