2002
DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055011922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While various concepts of culture can be found in research on cross-cultural management (see, e.g., Trompenaars, 1998), Hofstede's (2001) concept-despite being subject to criticism (see, e.g., Baskerville, 2003;McSweeney, 2002a, b)has become the most widely used concept of characterizing cultural values. While conceptual studies have discussed learning styles against the backdrop of different concepts of culture (see, e.g., Yamazaki, 2005), the existing empirical studies analyzing differences in learning style preferences across (national) cultures predominantly rely on this concept.…”
Section: Cultural Values and Learning Style Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various concepts of culture can be found in research on cross-cultural management (see, e.g., Trompenaars, 1998), Hofstede's (2001) concept-despite being subject to criticism (see, e.g., Baskerville, 2003;McSweeney, 2002a, b)has become the most widely used concept of characterizing cultural values. While conceptual studies have discussed learning styles against the backdrop of different concepts of culture (see, e.g., Yamazaki, 2005), the existing empirical studies analyzing differences in learning style preferences across (national) cultures predominantly rely on this concept.…”
Section: Cultural Values and Learning Style Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provide a framework for studying national cultural differences on six dimensions: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity, indulgence and pragmatism. Despite being subject to criticisms [11], [12], [13], Hofstede's model is acknowledged to be the most comprehensive and cited national cultural framework, in fact a number of successive studies have validated results [14]. For example, in masculine and individualistic cultures knowledge sharing is less automatically recognized, [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hofstede"s model has not remained immune from criticism. Several scholars have increasingly criticized the model in recent years (Baskerville 2003, Hampden-Turner & Trompenaars 1997, McSweeney 2002a, 2002b, Schwartz 1994, Smith 2002, Williamson 2002. Criticism of Hofstede"s model is acknowledged as wellfounded by many researchers, and by Hofstede himself, though many researchers still use his model (Silvia 2006, Twati 2007).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%