2016
DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2016-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Errors in Visual Estimation of Plants Cover in the Context of Education of Phytosociology

Abstract: In vegetation science including phytosociology, visual estimates of plant cover and point method belong to the common field method to record species composition and their abundance. Two methods were compared: Braun-Blanquet scale and point method using Levy bridge. A group of students performed measurements in five plots belonged to an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio-Carpinetum. It was revealed that there is a very high discrepancy in a observed number of species. Total mean numbers obtained are 13.4 and 31.2 for po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumptions of the LAI-2000 are that the potato leaves are small for the observed field of view (148° FOV), are an optical black in the wavelength region below 490 nm (i.e., not transmitting or reflecting incident radiation), and are randomly oriented with respect to azimuth [ 61 ]. For fCover, visual assessment is widely used in plant communities, due to its simplicity and rapid measurement; however, it can be a potential source of error, due to its subjective dependency and the difficulty in measuring the variable accurately [ 96 ]. Furthermore, when calculating the LCC from SPAD measurements using Equation (1) , the transfer function should be calibrated to the particular crop of interest [ 97 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumptions of the LAI-2000 are that the potato leaves are small for the observed field of view (148° FOV), are an optical black in the wavelength region below 490 nm (i.e., not transmitting or reflecting incident radiation), and are randomly oriented with respect to azimuth [ 61 ]. For fCover, visual assessment is widely used in plant communities, due to its simplicity and rapid measurement; however, it can be a potential source of error, due to its subjective dependency and the difficulty in measuring the variable accurately [ 96 ]. Furthermore, when calculating the LCC from SPAD measurements using Equation (1) , the transfer function should be calibrated to the particular crop of interest [ 97 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We averaged the percentage cover for all species in the four subplots to produce a single estimate for each sample unit. Although this approach can have some limitations due to subjectivity of the observer, there is evidence that, compared to other more objective techniques, visual evaluation can detect more plant species, including rare ones (Dethier et al, 1993;Chmura and Salachna, 2016). Besides, in this work, potential individual observer effects were likely minimal, as the field team was roughly the same during the entire evaluation period, thus making data comparable among plots.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the contrary visual methods are faster and cheaper. BB scale is the most popular visual based data collection method and has frequently been employed by phytosociologist or vegetation ecologists (Chmura & Salachna, 2016). This method was initially developed in studies on the mountain ecosystems of Switzerland and on the Mediterranean ecosystems in France.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the Case of Uncertainty Various integer or non-integer counts have been used or proposed for the code of BB scale (Poore, 1955;Westhoff & Van der Maarel, 1973;Campbell, 1974;Werger, 1974;Prieditis, 1997;Peet et al, 1998;Van der Maarel, 2007;Miller et al, 2014;Vahdati et al, 2014;Chmura & Salachna, 2016;Camiz et al, 2017). Numerical differences in description of code " " in the literature reveal that although certainly corresponds to " ", " " probably does not correspond to .…”
Section: Estimatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation