1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1963.tb06339.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Epigynous Glands of Zingiberaceae

Abstract: Robert Brown's interpretation of the epigynous glands of Zingiberaceae as derived from two out of the three members of an inner androecial whorl, the third member being the posterior functional stamen, has been held as probably correct for many years. Studies on many members of this family, both Indian and foreign, proved that the epigynous glands in this family are special vascularized upward growths from intramarginal portions of the carpels. These portions more or less correspond to two of the three septa o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raghavan and Venkatasubban (1941) regarded the labellum and the two staminodes as the outer whorl stamens and the two epigynous glands and the functional stamen as the inner whorl stamens. But Rao (1963) proved that the two epigynous glands of Zingiberaceae are merely an outgrowth from the upper surface of the ovary. Liao et al (2006) supposed the labellum represents the five members of the androecium based on the studies of floral vasculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raghavan and Venkatasubban (1941) regarded the labellum and the two staminodes as the outer whorl stamens and the two epigynous glands and the functional stamen as the inner whorl stamens. But Rao (1963) proved that the two epigynous glands of Zingiberaceae are merely an outgrowth from the upper surface of the ovary. Liao et al (2006) supposed the labellum represents the five members of the androecium based on the studies of floral vasculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). In spite of quite a few different opinions presented in the past about the nature of labellum based on the morphological and anatomical evidence (Rao 1963;Burtt 1972), the recent evidence on floral organ development supported the notion that the labellum was derived from the congenial fusion of the inner staminodes (Kirchoff 1997(Kirchoff , 1998Song et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Style 1 (Figs 1, 8) (Wu & Larsen 2000). Rao (1963) reported an abnormal flower in Alpinia vittata with two fertile stamens and a median sterile lobe. He believed that the two fertile stamens correspond to two subulate appendages and the median sterile lobe corresponds to the posterior fertile stamen of a normal flower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major portion of the nectary occurs below the ovary (i.e., is infralocular or sublocular), while the rest extends up the length of the septae to the base of the style (i.e., is interlocular). The nectaries of the Costaceae and of the female fl owers of the Musaceae are supralocular, though they differ considerably in anatomy ( Rao, 1963 ;Fahn and Kotler, 1972 ;Fahn and Benouaiche, 1979 ;Kirchoff, 1992 ;Newman and Kirchoff, 1992 ). Gynopleural nectaries occur in the Cannaceae, Marantaceae, Strelitziaceae ( Pai, 1963 ;Kronestedt and Walles, 1986 ;Kirchoff, 1992 ), and Musaceae ( Kirchoff, 1992 ;Ren and Wang, 2007 ) and likely occur in the Costaceae ( Newman and Kirchoff, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gynopleural nectaries occur in the Cannaceae, Marantaceae, Strelitziaceae ( Pai, 1963 ;Kronestedt and Walles, 1986 ;Kirchoff, 1992 ), and Musaceae ( Kirchoff, 1992 ;Ren and Wang, 2007 ) and likely occur in the Costaceae ( Newman and Kirchoff, 1992 ). The Zingiberaceae are unique in the order in having epigynous nectaries that do not appear to arise from the fused margins of the gynoecial primordia ( Rao, 1963 ;Newman and Kirchoff, 1992 ;Kirchoff, 1997Kirchoff, , 1998. The nectaries of the Costaceae and of the female fl owers of the Musaceae are supralocular, though they differ considerably in anatomy ( Rao, 1963 ;Fahn and Kotler, 1972 ;Fahn and Benouaiche, 1979 ;Kirchoff, 1992 ;Newman and Kirchoff, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%