The epidemiology of firearm injuries managed in US emergency departments

Abstract

BackgroundFirearm-related injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality in the United States (US), consuming resources and fueling political and public health discourse. Most analyses of firearm injuries are based on fatality statistics. Here, we describe the epidemiology of firearm injuries presenting to US emergency departments (EDs).MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Program Nationwide Emergency Department Survey (NEDS) from 2009 to 2012. NEDS is the largest all-payer ED survey in the US containing approximately 30 million annual records. Results include survey-adjusted counts, proportions, means, and rates, and confidence intervals of age-stratified ED discharges for firearm injuries.ResultsThere were 71,111 (se = 613) ED discharges for firearm injuries in 2009; the absolute number increased 3.9% (se = 1.2) to 75,559 (se = 610) in 2012. 18-to-44-year-olds accounted for the largest proportion of total injuries with 52,187 (se = 527) in 2009 and 56,644 (se = 528) in 2012—a 7.2% (se = 1.6) relative rate increase and an absolute increase of 3.3/100,000 (se = 0.7). Firearm injuries among children < 5-years-old increase 16%, and 19% among children 5-to-9-years-old. 136,112 (se = 761)—or 48.2%—of those injured were treated and discharged home without admission; 106,927 (se = 755) were admitted. Firearm deaths represented one-third of all trauma mortality. Three-quarters of those injured resided in neighborhoods with median incomes below $49,250.ConclusionsFirearm injuries increased from 2009 to 2012, driven by adults aged 18-to-44-years-old, and disproportionately impacting lower socioeconomic communities. Injuries also increased among young children. Firearm injuries remain a continued public health challenge, and a significant source of ED morbidity and mortality.

Rushing Gunshot Victims to Trauma Care: The Influence of First Responders and the Challenge of the Geography

“…It was observed in previous studies that critical injuries are more likely among older victims as well as victims who knew their assailants (Grommon & Rydberg 2015). The average age of an individual in the dataset was just over 27 years old with a normal distribution that matches with previous examinations whereby most shootings occur between the ages of 18 and 44 (Avraham et al, 2018; Hipple et al, 2019). The race/ethnicity variable was composed of three measures, each a dichotomous variable indicating whether the youth was either non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic or Latino, or Other, leaving non-Hispanic White as the reference group.…”

“…Firearm injuries continue to be a significant source of emergency department mortality and a significant public health problem for medical service providers (Avraham et al, 2018). Such studies would also be able to inform future programming at the municipal level aimed at alleviating spatial disparities resulting from the consolidation of health care services, an increasingly relevant phenomenon.…”

“…Almost certainly, the severity of the wound will be the single most predictive and influential factor in whether a person lives or dies as a result of gun violence, and this has been borne out by previous research on the issue (Crandall et al, 2013(Crandall et al, , 2016Hsia & Shen, 2011). GSW victims between 18 and 44 years old make up the largest proportion of all those injured, and 75% of all victims of gun violence are in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods (Avraham et al, 2018). Indeed, past research has consistently found a positive relationship between the age of the victim and GSW fatality (Libby & Wright, 2009;Weaver et al, 2004).…”

Evaluation of Injury Severity and Resource Utilization in Pediatric Firearm and Sharp Force Injuries

“…Conversely, the burden of self-inflicted firearm suicide is higher among white children. 1,5,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22…”

An educational intervention for medical students to improve self-efficacy in firearm injury prevention counseling

“…Both fatal and non-fatal injuries impose a significant economic burden on society and devastate families and healthcare institutions (Lee et al 2014; Fowler et al 2015; Russo et al 2016). Providing care to patients with firearm injuries is often multifaceted and involves multiple disciplines within healthcare (Avraham et al 2018; Bayouth et al 2018; Tasigiorgos et al 2015; Greenspan and Kellermann 2002; DiScala and Sege 2004).…”