The environmental disclosures of the electricity generation industry: a global perspective

Abstract

The electricity generation industry has been under close regulatory and public scrutiny for decades for the significant impacts its activities have on the environment. The industry is responsible for a large proportion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which has intensified public and regulatory scrutiny of late. Therefore, electricity generation firms face immense pressure to show environmental responsibility. Firms respond with environmental disclosures in their annual reports, in stand-alone-reports, and on websites. In this study, we use comprehensive disclosure indices to measure the quality (or comprehensiveness) of the CO2 emissions related disclosure and the overall environmental disclosure of 205 electricity generation firms in 35 countries. We find that firms in countries with a high commitment towards the environment and a carbon emissions trading scheme (measures of social concern for environmental protection and emissions), are likely to disclose more comprehensive environmental information. In addition, we find that firm size, age of the assets, listing status, and media exposure influence disclosure. Environmental performance, measured by CO2 emissions, is not significantly related to environmental disclosure among our sample firms. The theoretical implication of these findings is that social beliefs (that is different in different countries) prompt a legitimating disclosure response from firms that is not significantly affected by their performance against that social belief. Our results address one of the major social concerns of our time, i.e., GHG emissions and firm disclosure responses, and therefore the results will be of interest to regulators, managers, accountants, environmental groups, and researchers.

Board Characteristics, Country of Origin, and the Decision to Participate in the CDP’s Water Programme

“…The result for LAW suggests that the strength of law enforcement in a country does not have significant influence on companies' decision to participate in CDP water programme. This is consistent with Alrazi et al (2016).…”

“…The water programme, however was first launched in year 2010. In a similar vein, there has been abundance of research focusing on carbon disclosure (see, for example, Alrazi et al, 2016;Liao et al, 2015;Luo et al, 2013;Luo et al, 2012;Rankin et al, 2011). However research into why companies engage in water reporting receives scant attention.…”

Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence

“…CESD research has significantly increased over the last two decades with most of this relying largely on a single theoretical perspective, such as legitimacy, agency, stakeholder, resource dependence, institutional or impression management theories (Alrazi et al ; Chen and Roberts, ; Deegan et al , ; Cooper and Slack ; Mallin and Michelon, ; Shaukat et al , ), which limits our understanding of CESD practices (Gray et al , ; Haque et al , ). In contrast, this paper adopts a multi‐theoretical perspective (i.e.…”

Strategic Responses to Changing Climate Change Policies: The Role Played by Carbon Accounting

“…The introduction of an ETS and carbon pricing policies requires changes in the accounting and reporting framework to measure and disclose carbon costs and to identify climate change risks and opportunities (Boston and Lempp ; Milne and Grubnic ; Martinov‐Bennie ; Alrazi et al. ). Internally, carbon management accounting, which captures a firm's emissions in financial and non‐financial terms, facilitates decision making and leads to multiple economic benefits (Stechemesser and Guenther ; Rankin et al.…”