2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(99)00115-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy value of Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus albus for growing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained results are comparable with data reported by Donovan et al (1993) and Flis et al (1996). A lower dressing percentage of animals receiving the highest amount of lupine seeds was observed by King et al (2000) due to a larger gut fill caused by a higher crude fibre content in the diet. No significant effect of experimental diets on the CP and intramuscular fat content in MLLT was confirmed and the obtained data approached the requirements for the best quality of pork (Fernández et al, 1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained results are comparable with data reported by Donovan et al (1993) and Flis et al (1996). A lower dressing percentage of animals receiving the highest amount of lupine seeds was observed by King et al (2000) due to a larger gut fill caused by a higher crude fibre content in the diet. No significant effect of experimental diets on the CP and intramuscular fat content in MLLT was confirmed and the obtained data approached the requirements for the best quality of pork (Fernández et al, 1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Provided the essential amino acids are supplemented and the energetic value increased, 20% inclusion of the above-mentioned lupine can be used. On the other hand, King et al (2000) and Van Nevel et al (2000) observed growth depression, decreased feed intake and FCR reduction when 30% inclusion of white lupine was used in diets. Even though dehulling can result in a marked improvement of the nutritive value of lupine seeds, King et al (2000) failed to find a beneficial effect of dehulling and supplementation with amino acids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Donovan et al (1993) obtained relatively good results in fattened pigs after replacement of 75% soy with dehydrated white lupine. In contrast Van Nevel et al (2000) and King et al (2000) observed growth depression, lower feed intake and FCR reduction after 30% inclusion of white lupine in a diet. Moreover, King et al (2000) did not demonstrate a positive effect of seed dehulling and amino acid supplementation, they suggested a potential adverse effect of anti-nutritional substances such as alkaloids, α-galactosides or a high manganese level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast Van Nevel et al (2000) and King et al (2000) observed growth depression, lower feed intake and FCR reduction after 30% inclusion of white lupine in a diet. Moreover, King et al (2000) did not demonstrate a positive effect of seed dehulling and amino acid supplementation, they suggested a potential adverse effect of anti-nutritional substances such as alkaloids, α-galactosides or a high manganese level. The total carbohydrate profile seems to suppress the nutritional value of lupine, and after all, to influence digestion of energetic and nutritional substances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%