2015
DOI: 10.12737/16877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy potential of the wood bark in the program of resource-saving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found by Lehtikangas (2001), who found that besides suitability, bark pellets have excellent durability and tolerate moisture well. Melekhov et al (2015) studied the energy potential of bark in a resource-saving program, suggesting the thermomodification of birch bark for changes in physical-mechanical properties, which greatly simplifies further technology to turn it into pelletized fuel. Gil (1997) suggested using the waste and dust produced during cork processing to generate energy because it has high calorific value.…”
Section: Energetic Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found by Lehtikangas (2001), who found that besides suitability, bark pellets have excellent durability and tolerate moisture well. Melekhov et al (2015) studied the energy potential of bark in a resource-saving program, suggesting the thermomodification of birch bark for changes in physical-mechanical properties, which greatly simplifies further technology to turn it into pelletized fuel. Gil (1997) suggested using the waste and dust produced during cork processing to generate energy because it has high calorific value.…”
Section: Energetic Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Feng et al (2013), in Canada more than 17 million m 3 of bark is produced yearly, and more than half of it is burned or delivered to dumps. The amount of bark removed from lumbered wood in Hungary reaches 500 to 600 thousand m 3 (Molnár 2004), and, in Russia, approximately 30 million m 3 yearly (Ushanova 2012;Melekhov et al 2015). Quantifying the exact amount of bark produced annually is a complicated problem; despite strenuous efforts, its quantification involves considerable uncertainty, as only a small proportion of bark is traded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%