The Elsevier Article of the Future project: a novel experience of online reading

Zudilova­-Seinstra, Elena; Klompenhouwer, Martijn; Heeman, Frans C.; Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan

doi:10.1533/9781780634647.357

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Publisher‐initiated efforts towards realizing these possibilities for transforming the traditional format of the scholarly paper are based on studies on how researchers use online articles and primarily aim at improving user experience (Johnson et al ., ). Thus, for example, Elsevier's Article of the Future Project (Zudilova‐Seinstra, Klompenhouwer, Heeman, & Aalbersberg, ) sought to meet the changing needs of creators and users of scholarly information by implementing a series of changes to the format of the published paper. These changes centred upon the provision of interactive linking and navigation features to enable immediate access to specific information, images, and references in the article, as well as to externally stored supplementary material.…”

Section: Non‐linear Formatting Of the Scholarly Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models

Herman

Akeroyd

Bequet³

et al. 2020

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents an up-to-date portrayal of the greatly changed landscape of scholarly journal publishing and identifies the emerging trends characterizing it. We consider the attributes, novelty, and disruptive potential of different models, which range from improvements to the extant model to attempts at reconfiguration and transformation. We propose that journal transition can be seen as falling into three categories. The first is enhanced models of the traditional scholarly journal, which typically afford enriched functionality that breaks the bonds of the printed page whilst otherwise remaining wholly traditional in their offerings. The second category is innovative models of the traditional scholarly journal, which aim at supporting the journal in performing its traditional roles through convention-altering ways. The third category is the possible alternatives to the traditional journal, which represent a move towards alternative modes of knowledge dissemination. This review shows that each of the models identified makes contributions to enriching the reporting and showcasing of scholarly output. They also make it more effective and more efficient. However, we conclude that none of the possible alternatives being discussed can serve as a full-fledged alternative to the journal.

show abstract

Section: Non‐linear Formatting Of the Scholarly Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models

Herman

Akeroyd

Bequet³

et al. 2020

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ScienceDirect's accessibility testing was largely owned by internal experts until 2011 when the team embarked on the 'Article of the Future' (AOTF), the name for a new article design to support enhancements, with a focus on a friendlier reading experience (Zudilova-Seinstra, Klompenhouwer, Heeman, & Aalsberg, 2014).…”

Section: User Feedback Through Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ScienceDirect accessibility journey: A case study

Gies

2018

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policy, top–down support, educational working groups, customer data, and a central accessibility team have helped mature web accessibility at Elsevier ScienceDirect. Collaboration groups are essential for gathering feedback from users with disabilities and experts in the field. Many of the lessons learned from the first accessibility user study in 2001 are still relevant today. Alt text for figures is a challenge for publishers, and using authors or machine learning to provide text descriptions may be a solution. Accessibility is not an achievement to be won and done but a culture paradigm that integrates inclusive design into the very early phases of a product.

show abstract

“…Posteriormente, algumas pesquisas passaram a considerar aspectos de apresentação gráfica (STUMPF, 2003;MENDONÇA;FACHIN, VARVAKIS, 2006;GRUSZYNSKI, GOLIN e CASTEDO, 2008) e mais tarde, motivados pelo novo contexto eletrônico, as avaliações passaram a incluir também elementos de arquitetura de informação e usabilidade (SARMENTO E SOUZA, 2002;FACHIN;MEDEIROS;RADOS, 2008;LÓPEZ-ORNELAS, CORDERO-ARROYO e BACKHOFF-ESCUDERO, 2005;FRANCKE, 2009;MUKHERJEE, 2010) o que mostra preocupação também com a qualidade funcional dos periódicos, e mais recentemente, há pesquisas preocupadas em agregar recursos interativos às revistas (FACHIN, MENCONÇA, RADOS, 2008;ZUDILOVA-SEINSTRA, 2013;ZUDILOVA-SEINSTRA et al, 2014).…”

Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified

Critérios de qualidade em periódicos científicos

Passos

Caregnato

et al. 2018

I&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A avaliação de periódicos científicos tem sido preocupação dos pesquisadores desde meados do século XX. Os critérios de avaliação inicialmente propostos consideravam a qualidade das revistas científicas em seu suporte original, o impresso. Porém, com o tempo, essas revistas adotaram preponderantemente o meio digital para publicação. Neste contexto, interessa à presente pesquisa investigar em que medida a avaliação dos periódicos científicos tem acompanhado o avanço tecnológico, abrangendo também aspectos relacionados ao suporte eletrônico. A questão que norteia a pesquisa é a seguinte: como as metodologias de avaliação de revistas científicas comtemplam critérios referentes ao meio digital? Para responder a esta pergunta, identificou-se, nas publicações relativas ao tema, critérios de qualidade de revistas científicas associados às especificidades da mídia eletrônica. O levantamento de dados foi efetuado nas bases Web of Science, Science Direct e Brapci, na Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações, no Banco de Tese e no Google Acadêmico. Como recurso para visualização dos resultados, apresenta-se um quadro comparativo das metodologias de avaliação que destaca a presença dos critérios: meio impresso, meio eletrônico, hipertexto, hipermídia, usabilidade, acesso aberto, arquitetura da informação e recursos para interação e colaboração em rede. O quadro também informa sobre os autores que deram origem aos estudos relacionados e classifica as metodologias como qualitativa ou quantitativa. A pesquisa demonstra uma tendência de adequação das metodologias de avaliação de revistas científicas ao contexto digital e apresenta as áreas que ainda requerem estudos aprofundados.

show abstract

The Elsevier Article of the Future project: a novel experience of online reading

Cited by 6 publications

References 11 publications

The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models

The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models

The ScienceDirect accessibility journey: A case study

Critérios de qualidade em periódicos científicos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About