1983
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90138-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrophysiology of dopamine (D2) receptors: A study of the actions of dopamine on corticostriatal transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given numerous studies investigate the D2 presynaptic action, identification of the potential presynaptic mechanism was not the purpose of present study that was examining the DA modulation occurred via DARPP-32 cascades. Nevertheless, our data are consistent with a D2 presynaptic action on PFC afferent terminals in the rat NAC/striatal spiny neurons (Brown and Arbuthnott, 1983;O'Donnell and Grace, 1994;Cepeda et al 2001;Bamford et al, 2004).…”
Section: Da Regulation Of Cortical-evoked Epsps In Nac Spiny Neurons supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given numerous studies investigate the D2 presynaptic action, identification of the potential presynaptic mechanism was not the purpose of present study that was examining the DA modulation occurred via DARPP-32 cascades. Nevertheless, our data are consistent with a D2 presynaptic action on PFC afferent terminals in the rat NAC/striatal spiny neurons (Brown and Arbuthnott, 1983;O'Donnell and Grace, 1994;Cepeda et al 2001;Bamford et al, 2004).…”
Section: Da Regulation Of Cortical-evoked Epsps In Nac Spiny Neurons supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Given numerous studies investigate the D2 presynaptic action, identification of the potential presynaptic mechanism was not the purpose of present study that was examining the DA modulation occurred via DARPP-32 cascades. Nevertheless, our data are consistent with a D2 presynaptic action on PFC afferent terminals in the rat NAC/striatal spiny neurons (Brown and Arbuthnott, 1983;O'Donnell and Grace, 1994;Cepeda et al 2001; Bamford et al., 2004).KO spiny neurons had resting membrane potentials and input resistance (−78.1 ± 1.5 mV; 72 ± 7.6 MΩ; n = 24) similar to those in WT spiny neurons (p = 0.45; p = 0.22, respectively). Cortical stimulation-evoked EPSPs in KO spiny neurons (n = 24, 25 ± 1.8 mV; Figure 2B ) were similar in amplitude to those observed in the WT (n = 30, 22 ± 2.8 mV; p < 0.2, Figure 2A ).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8): (1) a loss of the inhibition exerted by DA on excitatory corticostriatal afferents. This may occur by a direct effect on D2 receptors located on corticostriatal neurons (Brown et al, 1983;Mercuri et al, 1985;Filloux et al, 1988). Alternatively, DA afferents synapse onto the shafts of dendritic spines, thereby inhibiting the glutamatergic input which arrives onto spine heads (Freund et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corticostriatal, presumably glutamatergic, terminals contact the heads of spines that often receive DA synapses on their necks (Totterdell and Smith, 1989;Meredith and Wouterlood, 1990;Sesack and Pickel, 1990). Since the DA input appears to modulate the corticostriatal input (Brown and Arbuthnott, 1983;Pennartz et al, 1992a), its removal may produce excitotoxic conditions that result in spine loss. Certainly, small increases of glutamate underlie spine swelling and loss in hippocampal slices (Siman and Card, 1988).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Underlying Dendritic Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%