1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf01232540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electronuclear method of generating neutrons and producing fissionable materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of accelerator-driven electronuclear facilities was suggested some four decades ago [5] and developed persistently ever since is considered to be a promising technology for waste transmutation. Such facilities differ from conventional nuclear power facilities that are operated in critical mode supported by delayed neutrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of accelerator-driven electronuclear facilities was suggested some four decades ago [5] and developed persistently ever since is considered to be a promising technology for waste transmutation. Such facilities differ from conventional nuclear power facilities that are operated in critical mode supported by delayed neutrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutrons produced in this fashion have a broad energy spectrum and are accompanied by an intense gamma-ray flux. Such "electronuclear" sources (based on designs calling for beams of 500-1000 MeV energy at currents of hundreds of milliamperes) have been proposed for materials testing, transuranic isotope production, and fertile-to-fissile conversions [34], It appears that the use of spallation-produced neutrons for fertile-to-fissile conversion is not economic at this time [35] but if fusion reactors prove unattainable and fission breeders are incapable of achieving short enough doubling times, then the electronuclear generation of neutrons will become essential.…”
Section: Symbiosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reactor designs incorporate a thin electrically insulating coatin~on the reactor first wall. Sputtering yields for such insulating coatings would have to he even lower than for Nb because less thickness reduction would be tolerable for a thin coating.With or without a coatinq, redeposition of sputtered wall material may erosion to an acceptable aMount even with the particle fluxes and yields suggested for the 0 pinch pulsed reactor.In the proposed steady state machines (mirror and toroidal), the maximum suoqested flux at the first Hall is aporoximate1y 3 x 10 14 parti-c1es/cm 2 /sec and the averaqe particle energy is expected to be greater than 10 keV (3,4). Again~sing the criterion of Equation 5, the maximum tolerable yield would be 6 x 1~-2 atoms/particle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%