1999
DOI: 10.1080/105735699278233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Electronic Transformation of Literacy and Its Implications for the Struggling Reader

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers posited that the types of affordances included in e-book programs may have differential impacts on student learning outcomes, distinguishing between enriching animations that promote understanding and overly-stimulating interactive features that distract from the core target skills. Specific affordances, such as increasing student autonomy, providing guided questioning, providing access to online dictionaries, and offering immediate feedback have been proposed as features that might further enrich the learning opportunities afforded by e-books (Biancarosa & Griffiths, 2012; Caplovitz, 2005; McKenna, Reinking, Labbo, & Kieffer, 1999). At the same time, in a recent meta-analysis (Sung et al, 2016), the overall effect of e-book readers (e.g., Kindles) on learning, broadly defined, was negative ( d = -0.70, whereas the effect of more interactive apps used on tablet computers and handheld computers was much higher ( d = 0.61 and 0.74, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers posited that the types of affordances included in e-book programs may have differential impacts on student learning outcomes, distinguishing between enriching animations that promote understanding and overly-stimulating interactive features that distract from the core target skills. Specific affordances, such as increasing student autonomy, providing guided questioning, providing access to online dictionaries, and offering immediate feedback have been proposed as features that might further enrich the learning opportunities afforded by e-books (Biancarosa & Griffiths, 2012; Caplovitz, 2005; McKenna, Reinking, Labbo, & Kieffer, 1999). At the same time, in a recent meta-analysis (Sung et al, 2016), the overall effect of e-book readers (e.g., Kindles) on learning, broadly defined, was negative ( d = -0.70, whereas the effect of more interactive apps used on tablet computers and handheld computers was much higher ( d = 0.61 and 0.74, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dictionary access and embedded comprehension questions with immediate feedback are two interactive features that have been found to support the development of word learning and reading comprehension (Bus, Takacs, & Kegel, 2015;Roskos, Brueck, & Lenhart, 2017;Scoter, 2008) and scaffold the use of reading strategies (Caplovitz, 2005;McKenna, Reinking, Labbo, & Kieffer, 1999). For example, a web-based interactive multimedia literacy software was designed to explicitly target reading comprehension strategies and was found to produce positive effects on vocabulary gains and reading comprehension for first and second graders (Lysenko & Abrami, 2014).…”
Section: E-book Affordances For Teaching Reading Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…communication from traditional in the form of printed media to modern in the form of electronic or online media. The transformation of media literacy, according to [3], requires changes not only in the ways or methods of teaching children to have literacy skills but also a basic understanding of literacy itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%