1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00941599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrodeposition of silicon in fluoride melts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some controversy over the mechanism by which fluorosilicate is reduced. It is contested whether this occurs by the double-step reduction of Si(IV) via Si(II) [9] or the single-step reduction of Si(IV) [10]. Here, we were able to clearly measure two cathodic peaks with cyclic voltammetry, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cyclic Voltammetry Between Inert and Consumablmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There is some controversy over the mechanism by which fluorosilicate is reduced. It is contested whether this occurs by the double-step reduction of Si(IV) via Si(II) [9] or the single-step reduction of Si(IV) [10]. Here, we were able to clearly measure two cathodic peaks with cyclic voltammetry, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cyclic Voltammetry Between Inert and Consumablmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The potential was swept with different rates (20,50,80, and 100 mV s À1 ) in the cathodic direction from 0.3 V. The recorded voltammograms are presented in Figure 5. The bulk deposition potentials independent of the scan rate indicate that the reaction is reversible.…”
Section: E Effect Of Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactions decrease the theoretical decomposition potential to À0.73 and À0.57 V for CO 2 and CO release, respectively. [11] The experimentally measured deposition potentials [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] are considerably different from these calculated values. For example, the decomposition potential on graphite cathode has been reported between À0.80 and À1 V, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] which is approximately 0.25 V larger than the predicted potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations