1986
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(86)90057-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrical and chemical components of the protonmotive force in chloroplasts as measured with capillary and pH-sensitive microelectrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tip-sensitive antimony pH microelectrodes were prepared as previously described (Remis et al, 1986). First, melted antimony was sucked into Pyrex glass capillaries (1.2 mm outer diameter).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tip-sensitive antimony pH microelectrodes were prepared as previously described (Remis et al, 1986). First, melted antimony was sucked into Pyrex glass capillaries (1.2 mm outer diameter).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also important is the role of Mg 2+ in membrane-transport processes in chloroplasts, where free Mg contributes to the regulation of photosynthetic enzyme activity (Shaul 2002). Additionally, proton pumping from the stroma into thylakoids lumen results in significant (DpH 2-3; Remis et al 1986) acidification of the thylakoid lumen. This massive light-driven transport of H + into the thylakoid lumen is electrically balanced by the counterflow of other ions (Hinnah and Wagner 1998) and, particularly, Mg 2+ (Pottosin and Scho¨nknecht 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in pH near the seed embryo during imbibition were measured using a glass-insulated antimony microelectrode with a tip diameter of 10-20 µm; seeds were placed into the same solution where imbibition proceeded. The microelectrode was positioned using a KM-2 micromanipulator; the position was controlled under a microscope (21). The tip of the microelectrode was placed at a distance of 5-10 µm from the embryo surface, which allowed detection of local changes that appeared earlier than did changes in the bulk solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%