2022
DOI: 10.1002/er.7640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficiency of M (M = Li, Na, or Cs) doped CdS nanomaterials in optoelectronic applications

Abstract: Summary A novel Cu/Na‐CdS optoelectronic photodetector is prepared and applied for detecting the light in the UV and Vis regions with high efficiency. First, CdS and M‐CdS nanomaterials (M = Li, Na, or Cs) are prepared using the hydrothermal method at 180°C for 24 hours. The prepared nanomaterials have crystalline structures that are confirmed through X‐ray diffraction analyses. Na‐CdS has the optimum structure with a crystalline size of 17.5 nm and porous structure looks small grass. Moreover, Na‐CdS has the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 While the peaks extended to the FTIR is related to both electron transition and vibration process. 39 The enhancement in the optical absorption is accompanied by an enhancement in the optical bandgap, 40 this appears in Figure 5B. The bandgap values for PMT, roll-GO, and PMT/roll-GO nanomaterials are 2.38, 2.67, and 1.65 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Prepared Nanocompositementioning
confidence: 84%
“…38 While the peaks extended to the FTIR is related to both electron transition and vibration process. 39 The enhancement in the optical absorption is accompanied by an enhancement in the optical bandgap, 40 this appears in Figure 5B. The bandgap values for PMT, roll-GO, and PMT/roll-GO nanomaterials are 2.38, 2.67, and 1.65 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Prepared Nanocompositementioning
confidence: 84%
“…This behavior reveals the great light sensing stability of the prepared photoelectrode. The slight changes in the J ph values could be negligible, as they could have originated from the effects of environmental gas, such as CO 2 or O 2 (active gases) adsorbed on the photodetector surface during the measurements [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This E a depends on the rate of collisions (k is the rate constant) and temperature values in Kelvin (T) using the universal gas constant (R) and Arrhenius constant (A) as the standard constant. From the E a value, the initiator temperature for starting the splitting reaction is determined [58][59][60]. E a values are obtained from slope of ln J ph versus 1/T as shown in Figure 6c.…”
Section: Ipce =mentioning
confidence: 99%