2019
DOI: 10.1111/and.13473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of regular penis‐root masturbation, versus Kegel exercise in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation: A quasi‐randomised controlled trial

Abstract: To explore the efficacy of regular penis‐root masturbation (PRM) versus Kegel exercise (KE) in the treatment of primary premature ejaculation (PPE). This study was a prospective quasi‐randomised controlled trial. Thirty‐seven heterosexual males with PPE were selected according to the time sequence of outpatient consultations and the preliminary results of a pre‐experiment and were assigned to an PRM group and a KE group. Differences in intravaginal ejaculatory latency times (IELTs) and premature ejaculation di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, for men, the frequency of masturbatory behaviors occurring during pregnancy increased statistically significantly and was statistically significantly correlated with high values of sexual satisfaction. The increase in masturbation in men during pregnancy may be a natural occurrence and a solution to sexual tension [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, for men, the frequency of masturbatory behaviors occurring during pregnancy increased statistically significantly and was statistically significantly correlated with high values of sexual satisfaction. The increase in masturbation in men during pregnancy may be a natural occurrence and a solution to sexual tension [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing 1736 papers through the title/abstract screening, 91 were retrieved as full text. Of the 91 full text, 36 studies were excluded because they were theoretical, opinion, focused on erectile dysfunction or included only pharmacological treatments, leaving 54 studies to be included in the systematic review 14–67 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data extracted from the included studies are summarized in Table 1 based on the type of intervention provided. Proportionately, 31.8% (n = 7) investigated different lifestyle, exercise and/or physical activities [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]; 22.7% (n = 5) investigated herbal medicine supplements [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]; 18.2% (n = 4) investigated topical herbal applications [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]; 13.6% (n = 3) investigated acupuncture or electroacupuncture [ 74 , 75 , 76 ]; and 4.5% (n = 1) each investigated vitamin, mineral and/or nutraceutical supplements [ 77 ]; hyaluronic acid penile injection [ 78 ]; and music therapy [ 79 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%