The Efficacy of Hypnotherapy in the Treatment of Psychosomatic Disorders:Meta-analytical Evidence

Abstract

Hypnotherapy is claimed to be effective in treatment of psychosomatic disorders. A meta-analysis was conducted with 21 randomized, controlled clinical studies to evaluate efficacy of hypnosis in psychosomatic disorders. Studies compared patients exclusively treated with hypnotherapy to untreated controls. Studies providing adjunctive standard medical care in either treatment condition were also admitted. Hypnotherapy was categorized into classic (n = 9), mixed form (n = 5), and modern (n = 3). Results showed the weighted mean effect size for 21 studies was d(+) = .61 (p = .0000). ANOVA revealed significant differences between classic, mixed, and modern hypnosis. Regression of outcome on treatment dose failed to show a significant relationship. Numerical values for correlation between suggestibility and outcome were only reported in three studies (mean r = .31). The meta-analysis clearly indicates hypnotherapy is highly effective in treatment of psychosomatic disorders.

Hryhorri Skovoroda’s theory on the inner voice and its application in hypnotherapeutic rest: an exploratory case study approach

“…of hypnosis and hypnotic rest Today, hypnosis is used extensively as a form of treatment as well as a research tool (Jamieson, 2007;Radovanèeviae, 2009). The recent literature highlights the large number of practitioners and researchers that are using hypnosis in both allied health and medicine (Flammer & Alladin, 2007;Jensen et al 2015;Weisberg, 2008).…”

The treatment of psychogenic movement disorders with suggestion is ethically justified

“…This article reviewed 21 randomized controlled trials in which hypnosis was compared to no treatment for a variety of psychosomatic illnesses including psychogenic movement disorders. In total, 65% of patients who received hypnosis experienced an improvement, compared with 36% in the nontreatment group 13. Multiple hypnotic strategies were applied, of which symptom‐oriented suggestions were the most common.…”

Clinical Hypnosis as an Adjunct to Cognitive Behavior Therapy: An Updated Meta-Analysis

“…First, studies that compare clinical hypnosis with various control groups (i.e., no treatment, wait list, attention control, but rarely other therapies) have been used as indirect evidence for hypnosis as a treatment adjunct. There now exists an extensive, albeit rather methodologically varied, research base attesting to the utility of clinical hypnosis in the treatment of emotional disorders such as anxiety (e.g., Crawford & Barabasz, 1993;Moore & Burrows, 1991); depression (e.g., Dobbin et al, 2009); in the treatment of health-related problems such as smoking (e.g., Green & Lynn, 2019); in the management of surgical/medical procedures (e.g., Tefikow et al, 2013); and in the treatment of various medical problems such as psychosomatic disorders (e.g., Flammer & Alladin, 2007), pain (e.g., Montgomery et al, 2000), irritable bowel syndrome (Moore & Tasso, 2008), and hot flashes (Elkins et al, 2013).…”