2018
DOI: 10.29252/beat-060208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for Predicting Hospital Mortality of ICU Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: Our study suggested that there was no considerable difference between GCS and APACHE II scores for predicting mortality in head injury patients. Both scales showed acceptable PPV, while APACHE II showed better results. However, the utilization of GCS in the initial assessment is recommended over APACHE II as the former provides higher time- and cost-efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ISS, AIS, ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were not normally distributed and were, therefore, displayed by median (IQR). The median (IQR) of ISS and AIS was significantly higher in the mortality group than in the survival group (25 11,17-28 and 16 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] vs 18 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and 16 [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] , respectively). Traffic accident (45.3%) was the most common injury mechanism, with motorcycle accidents accounting for 34.7% despite wearing helmets according to the Taiwan traffic regulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ISS, AIS, ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were not normally distributed and were, therefore, displayed by median (IQR). The median (IQR) of ISS and AIS was significantly higher in the mortality group than in the survival group (25 11,17-28 and 16 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] vs 18 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and 16 [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] , respectively). Traffic accident (45.3%) was the most common injury mechanism, with motorcycle accidents accounting for 34.7% despite wearing helmets according to the Taiwan traffic regulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15 , which is used to assess consciousness level, has also shown to possess strong correlation with mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury 16,17 . Considering these characteristics, a Japanese research group has proposed a new scoring tool, rSIG, which was derived from a multicenter retrospective study and calculated by multiplying rSI by GCS score 18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to hemorrhagic shock [ 18 , 19 ], traumatic brain injury [ 20 , 21 ] is another leading cause of mortality in trauma patients. The GCS score [ 22 ] is used to assess the level of consciousness at almost every ED worldwide and has been shown to be strongly associated with the probability of mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury [ 23 , 24 ]. Recently, a retrospective study from multicenters using registered data of 168,517 patients from the Japan Trauma Data Bank proposed that a new score, the rSI multiplied by GCS score (rSIG, i.e., rSIG = SBP/HR × GCS score), can be used to identify those trauma patients with a high risk for mortality and requirement of a blood transfusion within 24 h [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 BHV was measured using the ABC/2 volume estimation as described by previous studies. 16 , 17 Additionally, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was used to evaluate level of consciousness, 18 and disease outcome was determined using Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score. 19 Patients experiencing severe infection, abnormal blood electrolyte levels, patients with ICH related to trauma, neoplasms, coagulation disorders or thrombolytic therapy, aneurysms, or other vascular malformations were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%