2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of an augmented virtual reality system to alleviate pain in children undergoing burns dressing changes: A randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mott et al [27] tested the effi cacy of augmented reality (AR), an alternate form of VR. Rather than immersing the player into an imaginary environment, AR technology overlays images onto the physical world.…”
Section: Burn Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mott et al [27] tested the effi cacy of augmented reality (AR), an alternate form of VR. Rather than immersing the player into an imaginary environment, AR technology overlays images onto the physical world.…”
Section: Burn Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study comparing two psychological support interventions, hypnosis and stress-reducing strategies, found that visual analogue scale (VAS) anxiety scores were significantly better after hypnosis although there was no significant difference in pain reports (Frenay et al, 2001 Level II). Augmented reality techniques (interactive computer programme) produced a statistically significant reduction in pain compared with usual care during paediatric burn dressings lasting longer than 30 minutes, however further research is required to determine the clinical utility of these methods (Mott et al, 2008 Level II).…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this original report, other groups have reported similar analgesic benefits when immersive VR (Chan, Chung, Wong, 2007;Maani, Hoffman, DeSocio, 2008) or 'augmented reality' distraction (Mott, Bucolo, 2008) is added to standard pharmacologic analgesia for portions of (as opposed to the entirety of) bedside wound care procedures, although generally with limited numbers of patients.…”
Section: Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 96%