1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00257643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects on N2 fixation (C2H2 reduction), bacterial population and rice plant growth of two modes of straw application to a wetland rice field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve suggests that organic matter of rice straw consisted of at least two components, one rapidly decomposable (half-life, 17 days) and the other slowly decomposable (half-life, 58 days). BNF during the straw decomposition seems to be related to the rapidly decomposable component as reported by YONEY AMA et aL (1977) andLADHA et aL (1987). In the following experiments glucose and cellulose were supplied to soil as representative substances in straw.…”
Section: Exp 1: Decomposition Rate Of Rice Straw In Paddy Soilsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The curve suggests that organic matter of rice straw consisted of at least two components, one rapidly decomposable (half-life, 17 days) and the other slowly decomposable (half-life, 58 days). BNF during the straw decomposition seems to be related to the rapidly decomposable component as reported by YONEY AMA et aL (1977) andLADHA et aL (1987). In the following experiments glucose and cellulose were supplied to soil as representative substances in straw.…”
Section: Exp 1: Decomposition Rate Of Rice Straw In Paddy Soilsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the third cultivation, both growth-promotive and -inhibitory effects of straw and cellulose application, respectively, were observed but were not significant, probably because cellulose was not applied before the third cultivation (hence the effect of cellulose application was represented by the residual effect of the previous cellulose applications), and the addition of chemical fertilizer may have diluted the effects of straw and cellulose application. Based on the rice yield with and without straw application, Ponnamperuma (1984) and Ladha et al (1987) reported the increase of shoot and grain dry weight by straw application in field experiments. Ladha et al (1986), on the other hand, did not observe a significant increase in grain yield by straw application.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in paddy fields is generally enhanced by rice straw application. Evidences indicated the beneficial effect of rice straw incorporation on nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction and soil-nitrogen components) and bacterial multiplication (Rice and Paul 1972;Yoneyama et al 1977;Matsuguchi 1979;Harper and Lynch 1984;Santiago-Ventura et al 1986;Ladha et al 1987;Adachi et al 1989). The enhancement of BNF by rice straw application could be considered for more efficient use of organic matter with the benefit of BNF and for the development of low-input technology for sustainable crop production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, these rates of N2 fixation should be used with caution because the 15N measurements were made under laboratory conditions. Time-course measurements of N2 fixation using acetylene reduction methods (ARA) generally showed stimulation from a few days to about 40 days after straw application, followed by a gradual decline (Ladha et al, 1986b(Ladha et al, , 1987. When the N gain was expressed per g of straw added, it ranged from 2 to 4 mg N fixed g-l straw added.…”
Section: N2 Fixation In Flooded Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%