1992
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(92)90049-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of vinasse on the growth, biomass and primary productivity in pea (Pisum sativum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qiu et al ( 2014 ) reported that a high K + application rate (186.7 kg K + ha −1 ) to maize reduced the grain growth and consequently reduced yields. Other authors reported positive effect in the plants (pea and sunflower) in yield, biomass and foliar area, but only at low rate (2.5 %) application of sugar beet vinasses (Algur and Kadioglu 1992 ). In addition, Poz-Gonzalo et al ( 2006 ) reported that some areas in Brazil, have shown serious problems with K + lixiviation, as a 2006 consequence of high vinasses irrigation rates in the last decade.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Different Type Of Vinassesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Qiu et al ( 2014 ) reported that a high K + application rate (186.7 kg K + ha −1 ) to maize reduced the grain growth and consequently reduced yields. Other authors reported positive effect in the plants (pea and sunflower) in yield, biomass and foliar area, but only at low rate (2.5 %) application of sugar beet vinasses (Algur and Kadioglu 1992 ). In addition, Poz-Gonzalo et al ( 2006 ) reported that some areas in Brazil, have shown serious problems with K + lixiviation, as a 2006 consequence of high vinasses irrigation rates in the last decade.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Different Type Of Vinassesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, low beet vinasse concentrations (2.5% v/v) increased pea (Pisum sativum L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) shoot, root and leaf dry weight, whereas higher concentrations (i.e. 10, 25 and 50%) decreased the dry weight accumulation for both species (Algur and Kadioglu 1992). Therefore, vinasse potential positive effects on growth depend on application rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These dilutions were chosen based on previous studies, which used similar dilutions of vinasse to analyze its effects on different organisms (Algur and Kadioglu, 1992;Kumar and Gopal, 2001).…”
Section: Bioassays With O Niloticusmentioning
confidence: 99%