1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112082000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 10 4 and 10 5

Abstract: Results are presented of a series of experiments which were carried out with great care to produce accurate, comparable results in which the relatively small changes in the flow past a circular cylinder associated with varying blockage ratios can be clearly distinguished. The experiments cover a range of blockage from 2 to 16% and of aspect ratios from 4 to 10. End plates were fitted to the cylinders in all experiments.For blockage ratios less than 6%, it is shown that the effects of blockage on pressure distr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
125
1
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
125
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The total geometric blockage of the two cylinders was 4.2%, less than the level ͑6%͒ that may affect the flow appreciably. 17 The length-todiameter ratio of the cylinder was 48. Figure 1͑a͒ shows the arrangement of the cylinders and the definitions of P and ␣.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total geometric blockage of the two cylinders was 4.2%, less than the level ͑6%͒ that may affect the flow appreciably. 17 The length-todiameter ratio of the cylinder was 48. Figure 1͑a͒ shows the arrangement of the cylinders and the definitions of P and ␣.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the forces are measured for the full length of the cylinder and the flow velocity near the tunnel wall is smaller than in the free stream, the present measurement of C D is 0.9 %, 2.7 %, 3.6 % and 7.2 % below that measured by Nebres & Battill (1993), Ting et al (1998), Khalak & Williamson (1996) Gartshore (1987), respectively. Based on their measurements, West & Apelt (1982) suggested that the blockage had virtually no effect on C D if it was less than 6 % and could have a very small effect if it was between 6 % and 7.5 %. Therefore, the present blockage (7.5 %) is expected to have a negligible effect on C D .…”
Section: Fluid Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the measurements have been taken at the same value of free stream velocity equal to The noise level of the rms values of velocity has been evaluated according to the procedure provided in Romano et al [13] to be equal to 0.5 %. table 1) compared to the usually reported values (Okajima [14] for instance), however this can be linked to the blockage effect reported by West and Apelt [15]. A simple blockage ratio correction applied to the velocity value Table 1: Parameters of the shedding of the medium and the small bar (see figure 1a), AR stands for aspect ratio of a bar cross section and δ for bar thickness small bar medium bar…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%