“…These epidemiology studies have generated both positive and negative results, but do provide substantial support for the hypothesis that Se compounds have cancer preventive activity (Combs, 2005). In recent years, numerous investigators have reported inverse associations between Se biomarkers (toenail Se or serum Se levels) and the risk of neoplasia in several sites, including the prostate (van den Brandt et al, 2003, Vogt et al, 2003, Li et al, 2004, esophagus and gastric cardia (Wei et al, 2004), liver (Sakoda et al, 2005), colon (Ghadirian et al, 2000;Jacobs et al, 2004;Peters et al, 2006), lung (van den Brandt et al, 1993, Zhuo et al, 2004, skin (Burke et al, 1992), and urinary bladder (Zeegers et al, 2002). It should be noted, however, other studies have found no association between Se status and the risk of cancer of the breast (Dorgan et al, 1998;Ghadirian et al, 2000;Männistö et al, 2000), prostate (Ghadirian et al, 2000;Allen et al, 2004), ovary (Pan et al, 2004), non-cardiac stomach (Wei et al, 2004), urinary bladder (Michaud et al, 2002), or lung (Mahabir et al, 2006).…”