2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of the Introduction of a High-Nutrient Transitional Formula on Growth and Development of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies evaluated the effect of nutrient fortification [32,46,56]. Clarke et al compared the effect of nutrient-dense formula with the energy-supplemented formula on weight and length gain among infants with growth faltering (range: 2-31 wk) [32].…”
Section: Nutrient Fortificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three studies evaluated the effect of nutrient fortification [32,46,56]. Clarke et al compared the effect of nutrient-dense formula with the energy-supplemented formula on weight and length gain among infants with growth faltering (range: 2-31 wk) [32].…”
Section: Nutrient Fortificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarke et al compared the effect of nutrient-dense formula with the energy-supplemented formula on weight and length gain among infants with growth faltering (range: 2-31 wk) [32]. Another group studied the effect of nutrient-fortified formula (higher protein, calcium, phosphorous, and other vitamins and minerals) with standard formula among VLBW infants [56]. Both studies reported no effect on anthropometric outcomes.…”
Section: Nutrient Fortificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After discharge from the hospital, preterm-LBW infants might be fed one of the commercially available formulas containing nutrients at levels that are intermediary between preterm formula and term formula and have been referred to as "transitional," "expremie," "follow-up," and "postdischarge" formulas (Georgieff, 1999;Lucas et al, 1992). The use of these formulas has increased significantly since the mid-1990s (Worrel et al, 2000). In 1992, Lucas et al (1992) reported that U. K. preterm infants (n ϭ 16) fed an enriched formula until 9 months (corrected postnatal age) had greater weight gain and linear growth than did similar preterm infants (n ϭ 15) fed standard term formula after discharge.…”
Section: Feeding At Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this goal is rarely achieved because of chronic undernutrition and poor growth345). Neonatal nutrition and the resulting postnatal growth are major determinants of short- and long-term outcomes for preterm infants678).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%