2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of sugar-free chewing gums on dental plaque regrowth: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also include chlorhexidine [ 42 ] and copper chlorophyllin [ 43 ]. Hydrogen peroxide [ 44 ] and zinc [ 45 ] are antibacterial and antiviral agents, as are pycnogenol [ 46 ], stannous EDTA [ 47 ], sulfathiazole [ 11 ], urea [ 48 , 49 ], zirconium silicate [ 50 – 52 ], and also fluoride [ 53 – 56 ]. Among these drugs, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, sulfathiazole, and zinc have more potential to be loaded in chewing gum and as an oral disease remedy [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also include chlorhexidine [ 42 ] and copper chlorophyllin [ 43 ]. Hydrogen peroxide [ 44 ] and zinc [ 45 ] are antibacterial and antiviral agents, as are pycnogenol [ 46 ], stannous EDTA [ 47 ], sulfathiazole [ 11 ], urea [ 48 , 49 ], zirconium silicate [ 50 – 52 ], and also fluoride [ 53 – 56 ]. Among these drugs, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, sulfathiazole, and zinc have more potential to be loaded in chewing gum and as an oral disease remedy [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chewing of regular sugar-free gum dislodges loosely bound bacteria from the oral mucosa [100] and inhibits regrowth and maturation of oral biofilm on occlusal surfaces [101] (Figure 1). Nonetheless, there is no unanimous judgment on a chewing gum-induced reduction of biofilm regrowth on smooth lingual and buccal surfaces and a relation between biofilm removal directly after a single gum chew has not been firmly established [102][103][104], not even when abrasive agents were included in the gum [105]. Therefore, the EFSA has concluded that the claim that the chewing of regular sugar-free gum 'reduces oral biofilm formation' is unsubstantiated [102], although this conclusion does not rule out the possibility that the chewing of gum can modify oral biofilm composition toward a less cariogenic one.…”
Section: Effects On Biofilm Formation Composition and Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%