The effects of stress on the draw-a-person test.

Handler, Leonard; Reyher, Joseph

doi:10.1037/h0043053

Cited by 25 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Handler and Reyher (1964, 1966 indicated that when the stress and nonstress drawings for each respondent were inspected, two drawing patterns emerged under stress conditions: ~onswiction and expansion. Constricted,dravings were characterized by (a) heavies linp, (b) mmhbical breaks, in the line, (c) reduced line sketchipess, (d) detachad lar sehidetachecl body parts, a$d (e) decrease in size.…”

Section: Configural Scoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Problematic Methods and Unwarranted Conclusions in DAP Research: Suggestions for Improved Research Procedures

Riethmiller¹,

Handler²

1997

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Configural Scoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Problematic Methods and Unwarranted Conclusions in DAP Research: Suggestions for Improved Research Procedures

Riethmiller¹,

Handler²

1997

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“….90 (Handler, 1963); .79 (Handler, 1964); .89 (Jacobson, 1966). In this version of the manual, however, scores for both have been combined.…”

Section: Interrater Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“….80 (Handler, 1963); .90 (Handler, 1964); .88 (Jacobson, 1966); .83 (Nordquist, 1966). Downloaded by [New York University] at 07:53 15 May 2015 Score 3 when 4 or more emphasis lines XIIJ.…”

Section: Interrater Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If dicating pleats or folds in the skirt would Interrater Reliability .97 (Handler, 1963); .67 (Handler, 1964); .86 (Jacobson, 1966); .87 (Nordcrease or fold, chin, furrows i ; the fore-XVI. Distortion head, etc., are scored as Emphasis Line.…”

Section: Interrater Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ever, the use of such equipment may Alternative Approaches possibly pose too much restraint on the An alternative approach in scoring freedom Of movement required for Light and Heavy Pressure was employed by Handler (1963), and described in an article by Handler, Levine, and Potash, Additional Indexes one, and requires no apparatus. pressure scores.…”

Section: Anxiety Indexes In the D A P Test: A Scoring Manualmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Anxiety Indexes in the Draw a Person Test; A Scoring Manual

Handler¹

1967

Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A scoring manual for anxiety indexes in the Draw A Person Test (DAP) was based, in part, on the work of Hoyt, and of Goldworth, with a number of additions and modifications by the author. Twenty indexes of anxiety were described. Alternative scoring procedures were suggested for some indexes. The scoring was based on both a four-point scale and a twopoint scale. Interrated reliabilities ranged from .67 to 1 .OO.

show abstract

Education and Training in Psychological Assessment

Handler

2003

Handbook of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter concerns key issues in teaching and learning personality assessment, including a discussion of: (1) the difference between “testing” and “assessment”, (2) reasons for teaching and learning assessment, (3) methods of helping students to develop critical thinking skills in the interpretation and integration of data, (4) material on teaching students how to select appropriate assessment batteries, and (5) methods to help students overcome their natural resistance to the application of their assessment knowledge, lest they make errors and injure the patient/client. The chapter focuses on the experience of the student as he or she learns the material and on methods to make assessment more meaningful to the student and the patient/client. It also deals with ethical and political issues in teaching assessment, the influence of cultural diversity on assessment data, and assessment on internship. Several controversies are discussed, such as the preference for self‐report measures or projective measures and whether the academic programs or internship faculty should be primarily responsible for teaching assessment. The chapter concludes with a discussion of new and innovative issues in teaching personality assessment, use of computers and the Internet, therapeutic assessment, assessment of healthy aspects of personality, development of focused personality measures, and an expanded concept of intelligence to include personality variables.

show abstract

The effects of stress on the draw-a-person test.

Cited by 25 publications

References 8 publications

Problematic Methods and Unwarranted Conclusions in DAP Research: Suggestions for Improved Research Procedures

Problematic Methods and Unwarranted Conclusions in DAP Research: Suggestions for Improved Research Procedures

Anxiety Indexes in the Draw a Person Test; A Scoring Manual

Education and Training in Psychological Assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About