2012
DOI: 10.9708/jksci.2012.17.2.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of STEAM-Based Integrated Subject Study on Elementary School Students' Creative Personality

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to improve creative personality of elementary school students with integrated subject study program based STEAM education. On this study, I analyzed integrated subject study and STEAM, developed contents using educational robot applied integrated subject study program model. And analyzed result after applied to elementary school students. After dividing two groups-experimental group, comparison group-for this study, tested t-test. Finally I got a meaningful result statistically. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Morrison (2006) called STEM as an interdisciplinary approach as it established connections between similar disciplines. On the other hand, STEM education allowed students to learn actively, ensured creative thinking (Kim, Gook Ko, Han and Hong, 2014;Kwon, Nam & Lee, 2012) contributed to the development of problem solving skills (Abdullah, Halim & Zakaria, 2014;Cotabish, Dailey, Robinson & Hunghes, 2013;Kim & Choi, 2012;Kwon, Nam & Lee, 2012;Park, Nam, Moore & Roehring, 2011) and allowed learning with group (Ellis & Fouts, 2001;Morrison, 2006).…”
Section: Discuss and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Morrison (2006) called STEM as an interdisciplinary approach as it established connections between similar disciplines. On the other hand, STEM education allowed students to learn actively, ensured creative thinking (Kim, Gook Ko, Han and Hong, 2014;Kwon, Nam & Lee, 2012) contributed to the development of problem solving skills (Abdullah, Halim & Zakaria, 2014;Cotabish, Dailey, Robinson & Hunghes, 2013;Kim & Choi, 2012;Kwon, Nam & Lee, 2012;Park, Nam, Moore & Roehring, 2011) and allowed learning with group (Ellis & Fouts, 2001;Morrison, 2006).…”
Section: Discuss and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEM eğitiminin çocukların yetenek ve becerilerini geliştirdiğine dair literatürde benzer çalışmalar bulunmakta olup, çalışmamızda elde ettiğimiz sonuçlar literatürü destekler niteliktedir. (Cotabish, Dailey, Robinson, & Hunghes, 2013;Kim & Choi, 2012;Kwon, Nam, & Lee, 2012;Park, Nam, Moore, & Roehring, 2011;Riskowski, Todd, Wee, Dark, & Harbor, 2009;Sahin, Ayar, & Adıgüzel, 2014;Yıldırım, 2016a).…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified
“…In particular, we know little about how teachers, as a key agent of policy implementation, value and practice STEAM education. In fact, most prior research on STEAM education in Korea (e.g., Kwon, Nam, & Lee, 2012;Lee & Park, 2010;Son, Jung, Kwon, Kim, & Kim, 2012;Yoon, Park, & Myeong, 2006) and elsewhere (Owen, 2000;Raines, 2012;Sahin, 2013;Silvera & Rushtonb, 2008) has focused on how STEAM education promotes students' interest in STEM majors and careers. In short, despite the high interest in STEAM education by the government and within the scientific community, scholarship on roles of teachers in STEAM education has not yet been well established (Scott, 2012;Shin & Han, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%