SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1190/1.3059200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of seismic data conditioning on pre‐stack simultaneous impedance inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input data (Fig. 3a) have low signal-to-noise ratio; hence, before AVO analysis, it was required to perform gather conditioning (Singleton 2009). The processes used in conditioning were bandpass filtering (8/16-80/110 Hz), supergather creation (in a 3 × 3 bin), random noise attenuation with the application of Parabolic Radon Transform (for surface wave, air wave and random noise removal) and trim statics.…”
Section: Pre-stack Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input data (Fig. 3a) have low signal-to-noise ratio; hence, before AVO analysis, it was required to perform gather conditioning (Singleton 2009). The processes used in conditioning were bandpass filtering (8/16-80/110 Hz), supergather creation (in a 3 × 3 bin), random noise attenuation with the application of Parabolic Radon Transform (for surface wave, air wave and random noise removal) and trim statics.…”
Section: Pre-stack Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to AVO inversion, a seismic conditioning process was applied to the pre-stack data, following the approach of Singleton (2009). The key processes involved were coherent and random noise suppression, residual move-out analysis and spectral balancing between near and far traces.…”
Section: Avo Inversion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because stacking is in itself a filter, it is obvious that noise that contaminates poststack data is equal or stronger on prestack seismic gathers. Undesired prestack seismic phenomena need to be diminished or removed prior to reservoir characterization (Singleton, 2008). Although there has been considerable work on residual velocity analysis and trim statics, most publications that address the reduction of crosscutting noise on seismic gathers have been limited to processing across offset, one gather at a time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%