The effects of hygrothermal conditioning and moisture on the impact resistance of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates were investigated. Specimens were fabricated from carbon fiber/epoxy woven prepreg materials. The fabricated specimens were either immersed in water at 80°C or subjected to hot/wet (at 80°C in water for 12 h) to cold/dry (at -30°C in a freezer for 12 h) cyclic hygrothermal conditions, which resulted in different moisture contents inside the laminates. It was found that the absorbed moisture did not migrate out from composite materials at -30°C. Neither of the hygrothermal conditions in this study had detrimental effects on the microstructure of the laminates. Low-velocity impact testing was subsequently conducted on the conditioned specimens. When attacked by the same level of impact energy, laminates with different moisture levels experienced different levels of impact damage. Moisture significantly alleviated the extent of damage in carbon fiber/ epoxy woven laminates. The elastic response of the laminate under impact was improved after hygrothermal conditioning. The mechanism behind the improved impact resistance after absorbing moisture was proposed and deliberated.
NomenclatureD i Projectile deflection corresponding to incipient damage point, mm D max Maximum projectile deflection, mm D p Projectile deflection corresponding to the peak load point, mm D Z Through-the-thickness diffusivity constant, mm 2 /s DI Damping index E d Impact energy dissipated through damage creation and propagation, J E d1 Damage generation energy before the peak load point, J E d2 Damage generation energy after the peak load point, J E el Impact energy absorbed through elastic deformation, J E p Total energy absorbed corresponding to the peak load point, J E total Total impact energy or actual impact energy exerted on specimens, J F i Incipient damage load or load corresponding to the incipient damage point, kN F p Peak contact force between the impactor and the specimen, kN h Thickness of a plate, mm M f Final moisture content of specimens, % M m Effective equilibrium moisture content, % M 1 Moisture content at time t 1 , % M 2 Moisture content at time t 2 , % W i