2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of resistance training with blood flow restriction on muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy and functionality in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis(RA) and osteoarthritis(OA) patients showed systemic manifestations that may lead to a reduction in muscle strength, muscle mass and, consequently, to a reduction in functionality. On the other hand, moderate intensity resistance training(MIRT) and high intensity resistance training(HIRT) are able to improve muscle strength and muscle mass in RA and OA without affecting the disease course. However, due to the articular manifestations caused by these diseases, these patients may… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, to find the SD change presented by IQR, we use the calculation available below [20]. The choice for using these formulas was based on a previous Systematic Review with meta-analysis about effects of BFR training on strength, hypertrophy, and functionality for people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, to find the SD change presented by IQR, we use the calculation available below [20]. The choice for using these formulas was based on a previous Systematic Review with meta-analysis about effects of BFR training on strength, hypertrophy, and functionality for people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of SMD is represented by dividing the difference in mean outcome between groups by the standard deviation of the result within the groups. The formula between groups within each study used is available below [21,23]. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used, and the heterogeneity of the studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using the inconsistency test (I 2 ).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a systematic review and meta-analysis including 5 RCTs on patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, found no difference between LL-BFRT and moderate and HL-RT on muscle strength, muscle mass and functionality measures, with LL-BFRT more effect for increasing strength than LL-RT [141]. Another recent meta-analysis including nine studies on various knee disorders found that muscle strength increases were comparably superior for LL-BFRT, and HL-RT compared to LL-RT, with pain improvement superior for LL-BFRT compared to LL-RT and HL-RT [142]. Systematic reviews have also found benefit of LL-BFRT for increasing muscle strength and function in clinical patients during rehabilitation for pre-and post-operative anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction [143][144][145][146][147], knee surgery [148], osteoarthritis [149,150], various knee conditions [151][152][153][154], muscular atrophy [155], sarcopenia [156], and elderly patients at risk for various musculoskeletal conditions [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Bfrt Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-intensity RT combined with vascular occlusion is able to provide muscle strength and muscle mass gains similar to RT performed at high loads 48 . In addition, such benefits have also been extended to chronic arthritis patients (RA and osteoarthritis) 54 . Thus, although exercise has been shown to be effective, it will be important to continue to adapt physical training strategies to populations with musculoskeletal limitations.…”
Section: Systemic Lupus Erythematosusmentioning
confidence: 99%