1977
DOI: 10.2307/3150467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Price, Store Image, and Product and Respondent Characteristics on Perceptions of Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, relying on two following reasons, it infers that consumers are aware of price as an indicator in both purchase decision making and product quality perceptions. Firstly, there is more research in the importance of price in perceiving product quality than any other factors (Dodds et al, 1991;Swan, 1974;Wheatley & Chiu, 1977;Zeithaml, 1988). Secondly, in the classical economic theory, it is explained by default that consumers expect and act to receive the maximum value from the product with their money (Kotler, 1972;Lilien & Kotler, 1983).…”
Section: Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, relying on two following reasons, it infers that consumers are aware of price as an indicator in both purchase decision making and product quality perceptions. Firstly, there is more research in the importance of price in perceiving product quality than any other factors (Dodds et al, 1991;Swan, 1974;Wheatley & Chiu, 1977;Zeithaml, 1988). Secondly, in the classical economic theory, it is explained by default that consumers expect and act to receive the maximum value from the product with their money (Kotler, 1972;Lilien & Kotler, 1983).…”
Section: Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some studies relating perceived quality with retailer reputation (e.g., Wheatley and Chiu, 1977, Dodds et al, 1991and Rao and Monroe, 1989, it has not received as much attention as price, warranties and advertising. Furthermore, although sales force, publicity, and distribution are important marketing variables, they are not employed by all companies and it was the purpose of this preliminary cross-sectional study to be as general as possible.…”
Section: <Take In Table 2 Here>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, convenience, quality, variety and value lead to positive attitudes towards private labels (Collins-Dodd and Lindley, 2003;Vahie and Paswan, 2006) and store brands (Semeijn, van Riel, and Ambrosini, 2004). Store environment may also influence the number of items purchased, store liking, time and money spent (Sherman, Mathur and Smith, 1997), perceived quality of merchandise and patronage (Baker, Grewal and Parasuraman, 1994); sales (Milliman, 1982), product evaluation (Wheatley and Chiu, 1977), satisfaction (Bitner, 1990), and store choice (Darden, Erdem and Darden, 1983).This study aims to understand the influence of salient store image dimensions and overall store image on store patronage and also to identify the nature of relationship (congruence/ divergence) between customers" self-images and their corresponding store images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%