1981
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(81)90296-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of predictable and unpredictable schedules of physical restraint upon rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an increase has not been reported previously after chronic IMO in outbred rats [20][21][22], perhaps because of the low magnitude of the changes and possibly strain differences, as revealed by the present data. Exposure to chronic IMO increased basal B levels in BN, FIS, SHR and WKY rats, in good agreement with results obtained in outbred rats [16,20,22,50], However, such an increase was significantly lower in WKY than in BN, FIS or SHR rats, and LEW rats failed to show it. Our data indicate that neither interstrain differences at the pituitary level can apparently be ex plained by hypothalamic data, nor changes at the adrenal level can be explained by ACTH data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Such an increase has not been reported previously after chronic IMO in outbred rats [20][21][22], perhaps because of the low magnitude of the changes and possibly strain differences, as revealed by the present data. Exposure to chronic IMO increased basal B levels in BN, FIS, SHR and WKY rats, in good agreement with results obtained in outbred rats [16,20,22,50], However, such an increase was significantly lower in WKY than in BN, FIS or SHR rats, and LEW rats failed to show it. Our data indicate that neither interstrain differences at the pituitary level can apparently be ex plained by hypothalamic data, nor changes at the adrenal level can be explained by ACTH data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the unpredictable IMO paradigm (uIMO), the immobilization schedule was established to minimize predictability of the presentation of the stress. Several studies have utilized immobilization stress with an unpredictable schedule varying stress-rest days, immobilization duration, and time of day (Quirce et al 1981; Rockman et al 1987; Bryant et al 1988; Martí and Armario 1997). In the 3 day uIMO schedule (n=7), the schedule included immobilization on days 1 and 3 and no immobilization stress on day 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Experiment 2, we focused on whether the stress response in female prairie voles was affected by the predictability of a repeated homotypic stressor. While repeated exposures to immobilization stress can lead to habituation to this stressor when it is predictable (Martí and Armario 1997; Girotti et al 2006; Gagliano et al 2008; Rabasa et al 2011), it has been demonstrated that an irregular or unpredictable schedule of immobilization stress does not desensitize, and can even augment, the stress response in male rats (Quirce et al 1981). Therefore, we predicted that female prairie voles would adapt to repeated exposures of immobilization stress as a function of predictability, with predictable immobilization stress producing a habituating effect and unpredictable immobilization stress augmenting the biobehavioral stress response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quirce et al (9) showed that the increase of plasma corticosterone due to restraint stress can be gradually attenuated by repeated exposure to this stress, whereas Fride and Weinstock (5) reported that there is no adaptation to variable stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%