1970
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(70)90188-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of polarizer ellipticity on ellipsometry measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(17) The term ö appears in (14) owing to that the measurements of all the azimuths in the PSA system use the calibration data obtained in the PA system. By the way, the fraction of Kobayashi's Y error 'concerned with the "optical" sources is equal to ö, in terms of the present work.…”
Section: Psa and Psca Systems Characteristic Polarization Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) The term ö appears in (14) owing to that the measurements of all the azimuths in the PSA system use the calibration data obtained in the PA system. By the way, the fraction of Kobayashi's Y error 'concerned with the "optical" sources is equal to ö, in terms of the present work.…”
Section: Psa and Psca Systems Characteristic Polarization Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies noted in zone-averaged calibration measurements have been attributed primarily to the effect of beam deviation in the polarizing prisms. 4 ' 5 It has also been shown that beam deviation errors significantly limit the accuracy of conventional alignment techniques. 7 It is not sufficient simply to use an average value of X, as previously suggested," since 0 varies continuously as the polarizer azimuth is varied.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional source of error results from the variation in the position of the beam on the cell windows, the specimen, the compensator, the analyzer, and the detector. Hunter 5 attributes the beam deviation errors that he detects in his measurements to the variation in photomultiplier response as the beam position is changed by beam deviation but gives no indication as to how he isolated the variation in photomultiplier response from the other types of beam deviation error that may be present.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations