2010
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/12/7/075001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of planar metallic interfaces on the radiation of nearby electrical dipoles

Abstract: Light emission by excited species that decay via an electrical dipole transition is modeled as an electrical dipole antenna. We examine the various effects that occur when such a dipole is close to a metallic interface: wide-angle interference, coupling to the surface plasmon mode and absorption of the near-field. Analytical expressions for the power coupled to the surface plasmon and near-field absorption are derived. The case of a non-absorbing metal is compared to that of an absorbing metal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1a). This causes plasmon-mediated losses especially for perpendicular emitters 18 , resulting in a reduced lifetime compared to parallel emitters due to orientation dependent Purcell factors.
Figure 1The geometry of the two OLED types ( a ) is shown with an illustration of the orientation averaging models ( b , c , d ) and the corresponding expected transient observation ( e , f , g ). In ( a ) the emission patterns generated by the three orthogonal dipoles are plotted for the d = 30 nm case inside the substrate (angle θ s with respect to the normal, accessed experimentally by half ball lens coupling) or in air (angle θ A ).
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a). This causes plasmon-mediated losses especially for perpendicular emitters 18 , resulting in a reduced lifetime compared to parallel emitters due to orientation dependent Purcell factors.
Figure 1The geometry of the two OLED types ( a ) is shown with an illustration of the orientation averaging models ( b , c , d ) and the corresponding expected transient observation ( e , f , g ). In ( a ) the emission patterns generated by the three orthogonal dipoles are plotted for the d = 30 nm case inside the substrate (angle θ s with respect to the normal, accessed experimentally by half ball lens coupling) or in air (angle θ A ).
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a ). This causes plasmon-mediated losses especially for perpendicular emitters 18 , resulting in a reduced lifetime compared to parallel emitters due to orientation dependent Purcell factors.
Figure 1 The geometry of the two OLED types ( a ) is shown with an illustration of the orientation averaging models ( b , c , d ) and the corresponding expected transient observation ( e , f , g ).
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between the emitter and the Al layer was set at 80nm, which showed the best If we compare this enhancement to a bottom emitting OLED, we sse that a TOLED has an enhanced outcoupling by a factor 1.68 and a bottom emitting OLED has an enhanced outcoupling of 1.40 (in substrate and air). This is because in a TOLED the interference effects and plasmon coupling is stronger.Using only horizontal dipoles results in better tuning of the interference effects (because vertical and horizontal dipoles have different phases) and reduced plasmon coupling [9]. This has a comparitively larger effect in a TOLED.…”
Section: Top Emitting Oledsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For modeling of these two effects we use an ensemble of incoherent electrical dipole antennas with random orientation, 6,7 used in earlier work. [8][9][10][11] It is assumed that the OLED is a one-dimensional layer structure since its lateral dimensions (>1 mm) are much larger than its thickness ($1 lm). The emission of the dipole antenna is decomposed in plane and evanescent coherent waves with a transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarization.…”
Section: A External Quantum Efficiency (Eqe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiative efficiency g rad of an emitting organic material is directly related to the exciton decay time s. It is well known 3,10,12 that the exciton decay time depends on the optical environment (the layer thicknesses and refractive indices of the materials in the OLED) which is equivalent to the Purcell effect. 13 Therefore, g rad also depends on the optical environment.…”
Section: A External Quantum Efficiency (Eqe)mentioning
confidence: 99%