2017
DOI: 10.12771/emj.2017.40.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Peer Assessment and Peer Feedback in Writing Education for Premedical Students

Abstract: Objectives:There are several problems which hamper the successful teaching of writing in medical education. To deal with these problems, teachers should be conscious of two general questions; what to teach in writing class for premedical students; and how to utilize the writing class time. This paper examines the value of peer assessment and peer feedback in dealing with those questions. Methods: This paper reviews a subject in premedical education, Logical Thinking and Writing, from the perspective of peer as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a paradigm is not only ideal for reducing the teacher's workload, but it also allows students to learn from alternative solutions to the same problems proposed by their peers [15,9]. Thus, both student interests and skills are positively affected by using this kind of methodology [4,5,7]. In fact, PA is considered by researchers as an effective pedagogical strategy involving peer evaluations with scoring methods and feedback to improve learning performance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a paradigm is not only ideal for reducing the teacher's workload, but it also allows students to learn from alternative solutions to the same problems proposed by their peers [15,9]. Thus, both student interests and skills are positively affected by using this kind of methodology [4,5,7]. In fact, PA is considered by researchers as an effective pedagogical strategy involving peer evaluations with scoring methods and feedback to improve learning performance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%