2017
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of paternal reproductive tactic and rearing environment on juvenile variation in growth as mediated through aggression and foraging behaviours of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Abstract: In species with indeterminate growth, differential growth rates can lead to animals adopting alternative reproductive tactics such as sneak–guard phenotypes, which is partially predicted by variation in growth during the juvenile life‐history stage. To investigate sources of growth variation, we examined the independent and joint effects of paternal reproductive tactic (G) and rearing environment (E) on juvenile growth in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), hypothesizing G and E effects are partially me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the centrality of this assumption, most prior work is commonly conducted within a single reproductive bout or season (Marshall & Uller, ). These investigations are seldom representative of lifetime maternal fitness (Badyaev & Uller, ; Marshall & Uller, ; Plaistow, St. Clair, Grant, & Benton, ), particularly because maternal effects in one reproductive season may not be predictive of future reproduction due to fluctuations in predation pressures (Marshall & Keough, ; Sheriff, Krebs, & Boonstra, ), population densities (Dantzer et al, ; Plaistow & Benton, ), and resources (Forest, Dender, Pitcher, & Semeniuk, ; Hafer, Ebil, Uller, & Pike, ; Plaistow et al, ). While time is an important component of parental effects theory, particularly because such processes are inextricably linked with a mother's ability to translate temporally‐varying environmental conditions into offspring phenotypes (Uller, ), few studies have investigated variation in maternal effects over time (Benson, Mills, Loveless, & Patterson, ; Marshall & Keough, ; Plaistow et al, ; Sheriff et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the centrality of this assumption, most prior work is commonly conducted within a single reproductive bout or season (Marshall & Uller, ). These investigations are seldom representative of lifetime maternal fitness (Badyaev & Uller, ; Marshall & Uller, ; Plaistow, St. Clair, Grant, & Benton, ), particularly because maternal effects in one reproductive season may not be predictive of future reproduction due to fluctuations in predation pressures (Marshall & Keough, ; Sheriff, Krebs, & Boonstra, ), population densities (Dantzer et al, ; Plaistow & Benton, ), and resources (Forest, Dender, Pitcher, & Semeniuk, ; Hafer, Ebil, Uller, & Pike, ; Plaistow et al, ). While time is an important component of parental effects theory, particularly because such processes are inextricably linked with a mother's ability to translate temporally‐varying environmental conditions into offspring phenotypes (Uller, ), few studies have investigated variation in maternal effects over time (Benson, Mills, Loveless, & Patterson, ; Marshall & Keough, ; Plaistow et al, ; Sheriff et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%