56th Annual Device Research Conference Digest (Cat. No.98TH8373)
DOI: 10.1109/drc.1998.731143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of MIC/MILC interface on the performance of MILC-TFTs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The is defined as the gate voltage required to achieve a normalized drain current of A at V. The ratio is that of at V and the minimum at V. It was proposed [11] that the high in MILC TFT's resulted from an overlap of a continuous and highly defective MILC/MIC interface [8] with the drain metallurgical junction. Using an off-set structure to separate the MILC/MIC interface from the metallurgical junction, Ihn et al [10] achieved significant reduction in The low measured on the 30-nm devices indicates that the use of thin channel layers could provide an alternative approach to reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The is defined as the gate voltage required to achieve a normalized drain current of A at V. The ratio is that of at V and the minimum at V. It was proposed [11] that the high in MILC TFT's resulted from an overlap of a continuous and highly defective MILC/MIC interface [8] with the drain metallurgical junction. Using an off-set structure to separate the MILC/MIC interface from the metallurgical junction, Ihn et al [10] achieved significant reduction in The low measured on the 30-nm devices indicates that the use of thin channel layers could provide an alternative approach to reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior is typical of field effect TFT's showing partial saturation effects at high . The slight increase of at above 4.5 V is probably caused by grain boundary enhanced "kink" effects [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is manifested as current kinks in the - (Fig. 11) curves of the testing configuration with the MMGB self-aligned to the drain junction [25]. When the source and drain terminals are interchanged so that the MMGB is offset from the drain junction, the current kinks are suppressed.…”
Section: Device Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%