1999
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of landscape position on plant species density: Evidence of past environmental effects in a coastal wetland

Abstract: The study of small-scale species density has attracted considerable attention over the past two decades (Grime, ). This attention has been driven in large part by a persistent interest in the processes believed to regulate species density; namely, competition, colonization, disturbance, stress, and facilitation. Studies of species density have examined a number of the processes thought to be involved, Abstract: Here we propose that an important cause of variation in species density may be prior environmental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conforming to recent studies (Adriaens et al 2006;Cousins and Eriksson 2008;Cousins et al 2007) we might expect that the trends resulted from the analysis influenced plant species diversity, in particular species richness, or, as opposed to other studies (Cousins and Eriksson 2002;Grace and Guntenspergen 1999;Gustavsson et al 2007;Helm et al 2006;Lindborg and Eriksson 2004b;Milden et al 2007), that the historical landscape structure should, even in a changing landscape, influence present-day diversity. As reported in Klimek et al (2007), this is particularly true especially where topographic variables did not have a strong influence on plant species diversity and management historical regimes didn't change in the time range analyzed , as in our study area.…”
Section: Relations Of Landscape Measures With Patch Interior Species mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Conforming to recent studies (Adriaens et al 2006;Cousins and Eriksson 2008;Cousins et al 2007) we might expect that the trends resulted from the analysis influenced plant species diversity, in particular species richness, or, as opposed to other studies (Cousins and Eriksson 2002;Grace and Guntenspergen 1999;Gustavsson et al 2007;Helm et al 2006;Lindborg and Eriksson 2004b;Milden et al 2007), that the historical landscape structure should, even in a changing landscape, influence present-day diversity. As reported in Klimek et al (2007), this is particularly true especially where topographic variables did not have a strong influence on plant species diversity and management historical regimes didn't change in the time range analyzed , as in our study area.…”
Section: Relations Of Landscape Measures With Patch Interior Species mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Species diversity was not directly related to salinity or flooding frequency or duration, but diversity did increase with soil elevation. Comparable to Grace and Guntenspergen (1999), distance was indicative of neither soil salinity nor species diversity. In comparison to our barrier island approach, landscape position dimensions of Grace and Guntenspergen (1999) and Silvestri et al (2005) were less direct relative to environmental gradients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable to Grace and Guntenspergen (1999), distance was indicative of neither soil salinity nor species diversity. In comparison to our barrier island approach, landscape position dimensions of Grace and Guntenspergen (1999) and Silvestri et al (2005) were less direct relative to environmental gradients. For example, distance from ocean, especially when considering coastal wind flow patterns, represents a strong suite of variables that change as one moves inland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies imply that variations in abiotic environmental conditions, such as climate and energy supply, play major roles in explaining variations in plant species richness at community and landscape scales (Currie 1991;Wright et al 1993;Waide et al 1999), while biotic processes such as competition, predation, colonization, disturbance, stress, dispersal, and facilitation are important regulators at small scales (Grace 1999;Grace and Guntenspergen 1999;Zobel et al 2000;Crawley and Harral 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%