“…Further, while some have reported that hysteroscopic mHTR for benign intrauterine lesions have no adverse effects on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate [11], others have reported significantly higher pregnancy rates (65.1% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.045) and that time to pregnancy was shorter (13.1 ± 7.9 months vs. 16.3 ± 8.2 months, p = 0.04) compared to electroresection. They concluded that in addition to effectively removing intrauterine lesions, mHTR devices may facilitate the healing of the endometrium, thereby shortening the postoperative time to pregnancy [11,12]. Increasingly, electromechanical mHTR devices have become widespread for removing intrauterine pathology in both the operating room and office setting.…”