The effects of hysteroscopic morcellation of endometrial polyps on frozen embryo transfer outcomes

Effectiveness of Manual Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Device for Intrauterine Polyps in Infertile Women in Both Operating and Office Settings

“…However, while electrically powered mHTR devices offer significant advantages, including efficiency, precision, lower complication rates, and short learning curves [12,13], they are often accompanied by high start-up and operating costs. These include not only the direct costs of purchasing and maintaining electric control equipment but also the indirect costs of installation and commissioning.…”

“…Further, while some have reported that hysteroscopic mHTR for benign intrauterine lesions have no adverse effects on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate [11], others have reported significantly higher pregnancy rates (65.1% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.045) and that time to pregnancy was shorter (13.1 ± 7.9 months vs. 16.3 ± 8.2 months, p = 0.04) compared to electroresection. They concluded that in addition to effectively removing intrauterine lesions, mHTR devices may facilitate the healing of the endometrium, thereby shortening the postoperative time to pregnancy [11,12]. Increasingly, electromechanical mHTR devices have become widespread for removing intrauterine pathology in both the operating room and office setting.…”